Top AI Paraphrasing Tools to Improve Academic Writing



Paraphrasing is a common academic writing skill. Whether working on an essay, report, or research paper, you may need to rewrite some ideas in your own words while keeping the original meaning.
Writers often paraphrase to summarise, simplify, or highlight certain aspects of a given statement. It also helps demonstrate and facilitate the understanding of a topic.
In recent years, many AI tools have been developed to make the paraphrasing process faster and more efficient. These tools use artificial intelligence to analyse and reword sentences, offering new ways to express the same ideas.
This article introduces AI paraphrasing tools commonly used by students, including Ref-n-write, SciSpace, MyEssayWriter.ai, Scribbr, and Rewrite Guru.
What is an AI Paraphrasing Tool
An AI paraphrasing tool is a software program that uses artificial intelligence to rewrite text. It takes a sentence or paragraph and rephrases it using different words and sentence structures, while keeping the original meaning.
These tools work by using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning. NLP helps the tool understand the structure and meaning of a sentence. Machine learning allows the tool to improve its language skills over time by analysing large amounts of text.
Unlike basic text spinners that simply swap words with synonyms (often creating awkward sentences), AI paraphrasers understand context. They analyse how words relate to each other and produce more natural-sounding results.
For example, if you input the sentence "The study revealed significant findings about climate change," a basic spinner might produce "The examination exposed important discoveries about climate alteration." An AI paraphraser would create something more natural like "The research uncovered notable results regarding climate change."
Why Use A Free Paraphrasing Tool For Academic Writing
AI paraphrasing tools offer several benefits for students working on academic assignments:
- Time efficiency: These tools can quickly reword paragraphs that might take much longer to paraphrase manually. This allows more time for research and critical thinking.
- Language improvement: For non-native English speakers, paraphrasing tools can suggest more natural or academic phrasing that might not come easily.
- Comprehension aid: Seeing complex ideas expressed in simpler language can help students better understand difficult concepts.
However, these tools work best as assistants rather than replacements for your own writing skills. The paraphrase generator provides suggestions, but understanding the content and making thoughtful edits remains important.
How To Paraphrase Online Without Plagiarism
Paraphrasing without plagiarism requires more than just changing a few words. Here's a straightforward process for using online rephrase tools effectively:
1. Identify Your Source
Start with a reliable academic source like a peer-reviewed journal article or textbook. Read it carefully to understand the main ideas before attempting to paraphrase.
Many students make the mistake of trying to paraphrase sentence-by-sentence without first understanding the bigger picture. This often leads to staying too close to the original wording.
2. Choose A Paraphrase Generator
Select a paraphraser tool designed for academic writing. Look for features like:
- Academic vocabulary options
- Ability to maintain a formal tone
- Citation assistance
- Integration with word processors
Free tools like SciSpace and Scribbr offer basic paraphrasing features, while specialised tools like Ref-n-write focus specifically on academic language patterns.
3. Review And Edit
After using a word paraphraser, carefully review the output. The AI might miss nuances or create awkward phrasing that needs fixing.
Look for:
- Sentences that don't make sense
- Terms that were changed incorrectly
- Places where the meaning shifted
- Unnecessarily complex wording
Make manual edits to improve clarity and accuracy. Remember that the paraphrasing tool is just the first step in creating your final text.
4. Cite And Reference
Even when text is completely paraphrased, you still need to cite the source of the ideas. Include an in-text citation and add the full reference to your bibliography.
For example, in APA style, you might write:
Research suggests that paraphrasing tools can help students improve their writing skills (Johnson, 2023).
Features of Top AI Paraphrasing Tools
The table below compares key features of popular AI paraphrasing tools for students and researchers:
Tool | Best For | Key Features | Limitations | Pricing |
Ref-n-write | Academic writing style | Academic phrasebank, Microsoft Word integration, discipline-specific phrases | Limited to Word users | Paid software |
SciSpace | Scientific content | Technical accuracy, 75+ languages, research integration | Word limits on free version | Free basic plan |
MyEssayWriter.ai | Essay structure | Essay formatting help, citation tools, readability focus | Less effective for technical topics | Free trial available |
Scribbr | Plagiarism prevention | Academic tone options, plagiarism checker, citation help | 125-word limit per input (free) | Free basic tool |
Rewrite Guru | Multiple rewriting styles | Creative, fluent, and standard modes; simple interface | May require significant editing | Free with premium options |
Ref-n-write
Ref-n-write works as a Microsoft Word add-on specifically designed for academic writing. It contains a database of phrases from academic papers that helps students write in a scholarly style.

The tool includes:
- An academic phrase bank with thousands of common academic expressions
- Field-specific language for different subjects like biology, engineering, or psychology
- Sentence templates for different parts of academic papers
A biology student writing about experimental results might type "The findings show" and Ref-n-write would suggest alternatives like "The results demonstrate" or "The data indicate" that fit academic writing conventions.
SciSpace
SciSpace offers a paraphrase tool free for basic use, with a focus on maintaining accuracy in scientific and technical writing. Unlike general paraphrasing tools, it understands specialised terminology.

When paraphrasing technical content, SciSpace:
- Preserves field-specific terms that shouldn't be changed
- Maintains the logical flow of complex explanations
- Offers options to paraphrase in multiple languages
For example, it can reword a physics concept while keeping essential technical terms intact, something general paraphrasers often struggle with.
MyEssayWriter.ai
MyEssayWriter.ai functions as an essay paraphraser that helps you with overall document structure and readability. It's particularly helpful for students who struggle with organising their thoughts.

The tool provides:
- Suggestions for improving paragraph transitions
- Help with creating clear thesis statements
- Options for varying sentence structure
A history student using MyEssayWriter.ai might find it helps not just with rewording, but also with organising their arguments in a more logical sequence.
Scribbr
Scribbr offers a free paraphrasing tool with a strong focus on academic integrity. It's designed to help students avoid plagiarism while maintaining proper scholarly tone.

The tool includes:
- Options to paraphrase for fluency or standard academic style
- Integration with plagiarism checking
- Citation assistance for different style guides
An English literature student might use Scribbr to rephrase their analysis of a novel while ensuring they're not accidentally copying the wording of literary critics they've read.
Rewrite Guru
Rewrite Guru is an online paraphrase website that offers multiple ways to rephrase text based on different needs. Its strength is flexibility in how much the text is changed.

The tool provides:
- Multiple rewriting modes from light editing to complete rewording
- A simple interface that's easy for beginners
- Word-by-word synonym suggestions
A sociology student might use Rewrite Guru's different modes to paraphrase the same paragraph in multiple ways, choosing the version that best fits their paper's tone.
Who Benefits From Paraphrasing Tools
Different types of students find value in paraphrasing tools for various reasons:
Undergraduate students working on shorter assignments and essays use these tools to help express ideas clearly. When faced with multiple reading assignments, an AI paraphrasing tool free of charge can help them take better notes without copying text directly.
Graduate students writing theses or dissertations often use AI paraphrase tools to help manage large amounts of literature. When reviewing dozens of research papers, these tools help condense information while maintaining accuracy.
International students who are still building English proficiency find AI paraphrasing tools especially helpful. These tools suggest natural-sounding alternatives to expressions that might be difficult to rephrase when English isn't your first language.
Research students conducting literature reviews use these tools to summarise existing research efficiently. When comparing multiple studies on the same topic, paraphrasing tools help highlight similarities and differences in findings.
Frequently Asked Questions About AI Paraphrasers
Do AI paraphrasing tools handle specialised technical content?
Advanced tools like Ref-n-write and SciSpace are designed to handle academic terminology, but always review the output for technical accuracy, especially in specialised fields like medicine or engineering.
How much editing is needed after using a paraphraser tool?
Most students spend about 10-15 minutes editing a 500-word AI-paraphrased text to ensure proper academic tone, correct terminology, and logical flow.
Are data privacy and security guaranteed when using free paraphrasing tools?
Free tools vary in their privacy policies—some store text for AI training purposes, so check their terms of service or consider paid options with stronger privacy guarantees for sensitive academic content.
Expand Your Research With Zendy
While paraphrasing tools help rewrite existing text, finding quality sources to quote or cite is equally important. Zendy's AI-powered research library gives students access to millions of peer-reviewed articles across all academic disciplines.
Zendy complements paraphrasing tools through features like AI summarisation, which condenses lengthy research papers into key points. This helps students understand the main ideas before attempting to paraphrase.
The key phrase highlighting feature automatically identifies important concepts in academic papers, making it easier to spot which ideas are essential to include in your paraphrased notes.
Students can use Zendy to discover relevant research, understand complex concepts through AI assistance, and then use paraphrasing tools to incorporate these ideas into their own writing with proper citation.
This combined approach, finding quality sources through Zendy and rephrasing them thoughtfully with paraphrasing tools, creates a more efficient and effective academic writing process.

From Boolean to Intelligent Search: A Librarian’s Guide to Smarter Information Retrieval
For decades, librarians have been the trusted guides in the vast world of information. But today, that world has grown into something far more complex. Databases multiply, metadata standards evolve, and users expect instant answers. Traditional search still relies on structured logic, keywords, operators, and carefully crafted queries. AI enhances this by interpreting intent rather than just words. Instead of matching text, AI tools for librarians analyse meaning. A researcher looking for “climate change effects on migration” won’t just get papers containing those words, but research exploring environmental displacement, socioeconomic factors, and regional studies. This shift from keyword to context means librarians can spend less time teaching a researcher how to “speak database” and more time helping them evaluate and use the results effectively. The Evolution of Library Search Traditional search engines focus on keywords and often return long lists of potential matches. With AI, libraries can now benefit from search engines that employ natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to understand user queries and map them to the most relevant resources, even when key terms are missing or imprecise. Semantic search, embedding-based retrieval, and vector databases allow AI to find conceptually similar resources and suggest new directions for research. Examples of AI Tools for Librarians AI ToolMain FunctionLibrarian BenefitZendyAI-powered platform offering literature discovery, summarisation, keyphrase highlighting, and PDF analysisSupports researchers with instant insights, simplifies literature reviews, and improves discovery across 40M+ publicationsConsensusAI-powered academic search enginemanaging citation libraries, efficient literature reviewEx Libris PrimoIntegrates AI for discovery and metadata managementImproves record accuracy and user experienceMeilisearchFast, scalable vector search with NLPEnhanced search for large content databases The Ethics of Intelligent Search AI doesn’t just retrieve; it prioritises. AI tools for librarians determine which results appear first, whose research receives visibility, and what remains hidden. This creates ethical questions around transparency and bias. Librarians are uniquely positioned to question those algorithms, advocate for equitable access, and ensure users understand how results are ranked. In an AI-driven world, digital literacy extends beyond knowing how to search—it’s about learning how machines think. In conclusion AI tools for librarians are becoming more accessible. Platforms now integrate summarisation, concept mapping, and citation analysis directly into search. helping librarians and users avoid unreliable content. For libraries, experimenting with these tools can mean faster reference responses, smarter cataloguing, and better support for researchers drowning in information overload. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Why AI like ChatGPT still quotes retracted papers?
AI models like ChatGPT are trained on massive datasets collected at specific moments in time, which means they lack awareness of papers retracted after their training cutoff. When a scientific paper gets retracted, whether due to errors, fraud, or ethical violations, most AI systems continue referencing it as if nothing happened. This creates a troubling scenario where researchers using AI assistants might unknowingly build their work on discredited foundations. In other words: retracted papers are the academic world's way of saying "we got this wrong, please disregard." Yet the AI tools designed to help us navigate research faster often can't tell the difference between solid science and work that's been officially debunked. ChatGPT and other assistants tested Recent studies examined how popular AI research tools handle retracted papers, and the results were concerning. Researchers tested ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and similar language models by asking them about known retracted papers. In many cases, they not only failed to flag the retractions but actively praised the withdrawn studies. One investigation found that ChatGPT referenced retracted cancer imaging research without any warning to users, presenting the flawed findings as credible. The problem extends beyond chatbots to AI-powered literature review tools that researchers increasingly rely on for efficiency. Common failure scenarios The risks show up across different domains, each with its own consequences: Medical guidance: Healthcare professionals consulting AI for clinical information might receive recommendations based on studies withdrawn for data fabrication or patient safety concerns Literature reviews: Academic researchers face citation issues when AI assistants suggest retracted papers, damaging credibility and delaying peer review Policy decisions: Institutional leaders making evidence-based choices might rely on AI-summarised research without realising the underlying studies have been retracted A doctor asking about treatment protocols could unknowingly follow advice rooted in discredited research. Meanwhile, detecting retracted citations manually across hundreds of references proves nearly impossible for most researchers. How Often Retractions Slip Into AI Training Data The scale of retracted papers entering AI systems is larger than most people realise. Crossref, the scholarly metadata registry that tracks digital object identifiers (DOIs) for academic publications, reports thousands of retraction notices annually. Yet many AI models were trained on datasets harvested years ago, capturing papers before retraction notices appeared. Here's where timing becomes critical. A paper published in 2020 and included in an AI training dataset that same year might get retracted in 2023. If the model hasn't been retrained with updated data, it remains oblivious to the retraction. Some popular language models go years between major training updates, meaning their knowledge of the research landscape grows increasingly outdated. Lag between retraction and model update Training Large Language Models requires enormous computational resources and time, which explains why most AI companies don't continuously update their systems. Even when retraining occurs, the process of identifying and removing retracted papers from massive datasets presents technical challenges that many organisations haven't prioritised solving. The result is a growing gap between the current state of scientific knowledge and what AI assistants "know." You might think AI systems could simply check retraction databases in real-time before responding, but most don't. Instead, they generate responses based solely on their static training data, unaware that some information has been invalidated. Risks of Citing Retracted Papers in Practice The consequences of AI-recommended retracted papers extend beyond embarrassment. When flawed research influences decisions, the ripple effects can be substantial and long-lasting. Clinical decision errors Healthcare providers increasingly turn to AI tools for quick access to medical literature, especially when facing unfamiliar conditions or emerging treatments. If an AI assistant recommends a retracted study on drug efficacy or surgical techniques, clinicians might implement approaches that have been proven harmful or ineffective. The 2020 hydroxychloroquine controversy illustrated how quickly questionable research spreads. Imagine that dynamic accelerated by AI systems that can't distinguish between valid and retracted papers. Policy and funding implications Government agencies and research institutions often use AI tools to synthesise large bodies of literature when making funding decisions or setting research priorities. Basing these high-stakes choices on retracted work wastes resources and potentially misdirects entire fields of inquiry. A withdrawn climate study or economic analysis could influence policy for years before anyone discovers the AI-assisted review included discredited research. Academic reputation damage For individual researchers, citing retracted papers carries professional consequences. Journals may reject manuscripts, tenure committees question research rigour, and collaborators lose confidence. While honest mistakes happen, the frequency of such errors increases when researchers rely on AI tools that lack retraction awareness, and the responsibility still falls on the researcher, not the AI. Why Language Models Miss Retraction Signals The technical architecture of most AI research assistants makes them inherently vulnerable to the retraction problem. Understanding why helps explain what solutions might actually work. Corpus quality controls lacking AI models learn from their training corpus, the massive collection of text they analyse during development. Most organisations building these models prioritise breadth over curation, scraping academic databases, preprint servers, and publisher websites without rigorous quality checks. The assumption is that more data produces better models, but this approach treats all papers equally regardless of retraction status. Even when training data includes retraction notices, the AI might not recognise them as signals to discount the paper's content. A retraction notice is just another piece of text unless the model has been specifically trained to understand its significance. Sparse or inconsistent metadata Publishers handle retractions differently, creating inconsistencies that confuse automated systems: Some journals add "RETRACTED" to article titles Others publish separate retraction notices A few quietly remove papers entirely This lack of standardisation means AI systems trained to recognise one retraction format might miss others completely. Metadata، the structured information describing each paper, often fails to consistently flag retraction status across databases. A paper retracted in PubMed might still appear without warning in other indexes that AI training pipelines access. Hallucination and overconfidence AI hallucination occurs when models generate plausible-sounding but false information, and it exacerbates the retraction problem. Even if a model has no information about a topic, it might confidently fabricate citations or misremember details from its training data. This overconfidence means AI assistants rarely express uncertainty about the papers they recommend, leaving users with no indication that additional verification is needed. Real-Time Retraction Data Sources Researchers Should Trust While AI tools struggle with retractions, several authoritative databases exist for manual verification. Researchers concerned about citation integrity can cross-reference their sources against these resources. Retraction Watch Database Retraction Watch operates as an independent watchdog, tracking retractions across all academic disciplines and publishers. Their freely accessible database includes detailed explanations of why papers were withdrawn, from honest error to fraud. The organisation's blog also provides context about patterns in retractions and systemic issues in scholarly publishing. Crossref metadata service Crossref maintains the infrastructure that assigns DOIs to scholarly works, and publishers report retractions through this system. While coverage depends on publishers properly flagging retractions, Crossref offers a comprehensive view across multiple disciplines and publication types. Their API allows developers to build tools that automatically check retraction status, a capability that forward-thinking platforms are beginning to implement. PubMed retracted publication tag For medical and life sciences research, PubMed provides reliable retraction flagging with daily updates. The National Library of Medicine maintains this database with rigorous quality control, ensuring retracted papers receive prominent warning labels. However, this coverage is limited to biomedical literature, leaving researchers in other fields without equivalent resources. DatabaseCoverageUpdate SpeedAccessRetraction WatchAll disciplinesReal-timeFreeCrossrefPublisher-reportedVariableFree APIPubMedMedical/life sciencesDailyFree Responsible AI Starts with Licensing When AI systems access research papers, articles, or datasets, authors and publishers have legal and ethical rights that need protection. Ignoring these rights can undermine the sustainability of the research ecosystem and diminish trust between researchers and technology providers. One of the biggest reasons AI tools get it wrong is that they often cite retracted papers as if they’re still valid. When an article is retracted, e.g. due to peer review process not being conducted properly or failing to meet established standards, most AI systems don’t know, it simply remains part of their training data. This is where licensing plays a crucial role. Licensed data ensures that AI systems are connected to the right sources, continuously updated with accurate, publisher-verified information. It’s the foundation for what platforms like Zendy aim to achieve: making sure the content is clean and trustworthy. Licensing ensures that content is used responsibly. Proper agreements between AI companies and copyright holders allow AI systems to access material legally while providing attribution and, when appropriate, compensation. This is especially important when AI tools generate insights or summaries that are distributed at scale, potentially creating value for commercial platforms without benefiting the sources of the content. in conclusion, consent-driven licensing helps build trust. Publishers and authors can choose whether and how their work is incorporated into AI systems, ensuring that content is included only when rights are respected. Advanced AI platforms, such as Zendy, can even track which licensed sources contributed to a particular output, providing accountability and a foundation for equitable revenue sharing. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

5 Tools Every Librarian Should Know in 2025
The role of librarians has always been about connecting people with knowledge. But in 2025, with so much information floating around online, the challenge isn’t access, it’s sorting through the noise and finding what really matters. This is where AI for libraries is starting to make a difference. Here are five that are worth keeping in your back pocket this year. 1. Zendy Zendy is a one-stop AI-powered research library that blends open access with subscription-based resources. Instead of juggling multiple platforms, librarians can point students and researchers to one place where they’ll find academic articles, reports, and AI tools to help with research discovery and literature review. With its growing use of AI for libraries, Zendy makes it easier to summarise research, highlight key ideas, and support literature reviews without adding to the librarian’s workload. 2. LibGuides Still one of the most practical tools for librarians, LibGuides makes it easy to create tailored resource guides for courses, programs, or specific assignments. Whether you’re curating resources for first-year students or putting together a subject guide for advanced research, it helps librarians stay organised while keeping information accessible to learners. 3. OpenRefine Cleaning up messy data is nobody’s favourite job, but it’s a reality when working with bibliographic records or digital archives. OpenRefine is like a spreadsheet, but with superpowers, it can quickly detect duplicates, fix formatting issues, and make large datasets more manageable. For librarians working in cataloguing or digital collections, it saves hours of tedious work. 4. PressReader Library patrons aren’t just looking for academic content; they often want newspapers, magazines, and general reading material too. PressReader gives libraries a simple way to provide access to thousands of publications from around the world. It’s especially valuable in public libraries or institutions with international communities. 5. OCLC WorldShare Managing collections and sharing resources across institutions is a constant task. OCLC WorldShare helps libraries handle cataloguing, interlibrary loans, and metadata management. It’s not flashy, but it makes collaboration between libraries smoother and ensures that resources don’t sit unused when another community could benefit from them. Final thought The tools above aren’t just about technology, they’re about making everyday library work more practical. Whether it’s curating resources with Zendy, cleaning data with OpenRefine, or sharing collections through WorldShare, these platforms help librarians do what they do best: guide people toward knowledge that matters. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom