Discover

Top 7 AI literature review tools to speed up your research

Jul 22, 2025 |

24 Mins Read

Literature reviews are an essential part of any research project. They involve reading and analysing existing studies to understand what has already been discovered.

In the past, this process required researchers to search through many databases, download papers, and take detailed notes by hand. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), new tools have emerged to make this process more efficient.

These tools are known as AI literature review tools. They use technology to help researchers find, summarise, and organise academic content faster than before.

What Are AI Literature Review Tools

AI literature review tools are digital platforms that use artificial intelligence to support the process of finding and analysing academic research. These tools help students, scholars, and professionals handle large volumes of information more effectively.

They solve common problems researchers face, such as limited time, difficulty locating relevant studies, and managing large sets of documents. Instead of reading dozens of papers manually, users can explore summaries, filter key concepts, and organise sources with the help of AI.

Research workflows have shifted from manual searching and reading to assisted processes where AI helps identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature.

Faster literature review:
Enhanced discovery:
Better organisation:

Most AI literature review tools use machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) to understand academic text and improve their recommendations over time.

How To Choose the Best AI Literature Review Tool

When looking at different AI literature review tools, it helps to focus on a few key areas that affect how useful they'll be for your research.

Evaluate Summarisation Capabilities

AI summarisation tools condense long academic papers into shorter versions. Some only summarise abstracts, while others process entire papers.

The quality of these summaries varies widely. Good summaries capture the main findings, methodology, and limitations without misrepresenting the original work.

When evaluating AI literature review tools, check if the summaries:

Include the main research question
Mention the methodology used
Summarise key findings
Note any important limitations

Check Integration With Citation Apps

Most researchers use citation management tools to organise references. The best AI literature review tools connect with these programs.

Look for tools that integrate with popular citation managers like Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote, or RefWorks. This integration saves time by automatically formatting citations and building bibliographies.

Some AI literature review tools also offer direct export options in formats like BibTeX or RIS, which can be imported into most citation software.

Assess Search Scope And Coverage

Different AI literature review tools search different databases. Some focus on open-access content, while others include both open and paywalled articles.

Coverage also varies by subject. A tool might excel in medical research but have limited content in engineering or humanities.

When comparing options, consider:

The total number of articles available
Coverage across different disciplines
Access to both recent and historical papers
Availability of full-text articles versus just metadata

Consider Cost And Access Models

AI research tools use various pricing approaches:

Freemium: Basic features are free, advanced features are paid
Subscription: Monthly or annual fee for full access
Pay-per-use: Charges for specific actions like downloading papers

Some AI literature review tools offer institutional access through universities or research organisations. This can provide broader access at a lower cost per user.

Geographic restrictions may apply to certain subscriptions or publisher agreements, which is important for international researchers.

Zendy: AI-powered Research Library

Zendy combines a large collection of academic content with AI tools designed to make research more efficient. The platform gives access to millions of research papers, including both open-access and paywalled content.

The AI assistant feature, ZAIA, helps users find relevant information quickly by answering research questions with evidence from academic sources. This saves time compared to manual searching and reading.

Zendy also offers AI Summarisation that condenses long papers into shorter overviews, capturing the main points without losing critical details. The Key-Phrase Highlighting feature automatically marks important concepts in the text.

For organising, Zendy includes reading list tools that help researchers group related papers and track their progress through important sources.

The platform covers all academic disciplines, making it useful for researchers in fields from medicine and engineering to social sciences and humanities.

Global accessibility: Available in over 200 countries
Affordable access: Provides options for individual researchers without institutional affiliations
User-friendly interface: Designed to be accessible without extensive training
Cross-disciplinary coverage: Includes content across all major academic fields

Litmaps, ResearchPal, Sourcely, Consensus, R Discovery, Scinapse.io

Each AI literature review platform has its own approach and strengths. Here's how they compare:

Platform	Primary Strength	Key Features	Best For	Limitations
Litmaps	Visual citation mapping	Citation graphs, seed maps, relationship discovery	Exploring how papers connect to each other	Limited summarisation capabilities
ResearchPal	Organisation tools	Reference management, article summaries, citation generation	Writing papers and managing references	Core features require paid subscription
Sourcely	Cross-referencing	Source discovery, citation suggestions, interdisciplinary connections	Finding sources across different fields	Limited visualisation tools
Consensus	Evidence extraction	Question-based search, consensus scoring, insight summarisation	Checking scientific agreement on topics	Free version has restricted depth
R Discovery	Personalised recommendations	Custom feeds, audio papers, PDF chat	Staying updated with new research	Less focus on analysis and citation networks
Scinapse.io	Broad search capabilities	Academic indexing, keyword search, filters	General academic paper discovery	Minimal AI enhancements

This comparison helps identify which tool might work best for specific research needs or workflows.

Key Features To Consider Before Choosing A Tool

When selecting an AI tool for literature reviews, certain features matter more depending on your research goals.

AI Summaries And Recommendations

AI summaries help researchers quickly understand papers without reading the full text. The quality varies between platforms—some provide basic topic overviews while others offer detailed analysis.

Look for tools that accurately capture the main points without misrepresenting findings. The best platforms let you adjust summary length and focus on specific sections like methodology or results.

For example, Zendy's AI summarisation processes the full text and highlights key concepts, making it easier to determine if a paper is relevant to your research.

Visual Discovery Or Concept Mapping

Visual tools show relationships between papers, authors, or topics through interactive maps or graphs. These visualisations help identify research gaps and understand how ideas connect.

This feature is particularly valuable when:

Starting research in a new field
Tracking how concepts have evolved over time
Identifying influential papers or authors
Finding unexplored connections between topics

Tools like Litmaps excel at showing citation networks, while others focus more on conceptual relationships.

Personalised Research Feeds

Personalised feeds suggest new papers based on your research interests and reading history. These recommendations become more accurate as you interact with the platform.

Most systems need time to learn your preferences. The more you use them, the better they become at finding relevant content.

These feeds help researchers stay current with new publications without manually searching multiple databases. They're especially useful for ongoing projects or keeping up with rapidly evolving fields.

Cost, Freemium Or Institutional Access

Cost considerations vary depending on your situation:

Students might prefer free or low-cost options
Professional researchers may need more comprehensive tools
Teams benefit from platforms with collaboration features
Institutions look for broad access at reasonable rates

Many platforms offer free trials or basic plans with limited features. This lets you test their functionality before committing to a subscription.

Institutional access through universities or research organisations often provides the best value, giving you full features at a reduced cost.

Why Researchers Choose Zendy For Literature Reviews

Researchers select Zendy because it combines comprehensive content access with practical AI tools that streamline the literature review process.

The platform offers both open access and paywalled content, making it valuable for independent researchers without institutional affiliations. This accessibility is particularly important in regions where academic resources are limited.

ZAIA, Zendy's AI assistant, answers research questions directly, saving time compared to manual searching. The summarisation tool condenses long papers into readable overviews, helping researchers quickly determine which studies are most relevant.

You will appreciate the intuitive interface that requires minimal training. The reading list feature helps you organise sources by topic, making it easier to track and cite references later.

Researchers from diverse fields find value in Zendy:

Medical professionals use it to prepare for conferences and stay current with new treatments
Students rely on it for thesis research and course assignments
Independent scholars access academic content without institutional subscriptions
Faculty members find sources across disciplines for interdisciplinary projects

The platform's global availability in over 200 countries supports Zendy's mission of reducing barriers to knowledge access.

Moving Forward With AI-Driven Research And Discovery

AI is changing how researchers approach literature reviews. These tools are becoming essential for managing the growing volume of academic publications.

The future of academic research tools will likely include more sophisticated analysis capabilities. Current AI literature review tools already help find and summarise content, but newer systems will better identify research gaps and suggest connections between seemingly unrelated fields.

For researchers new to AI literature review tools, starting with a clear research question helps focus the search process. Testing different platforms with the same query can reveal which one works best for your specific needs.

Zendy offers a combination of AI-powered discovery, summarisation tools, and broad content access. You can explore the platform at zendy.io.

Looking ahead, we can expect:

More accurate full-text summarisation across different fields
Better support for non-English research materials
Improved citation analysis and validation
Greater integration with writing and publishing tools

These developments will continue to make the research process more efficient while maintaining academic rigour.

How do AI literature review tools handle non-English content?

Most AI literature review platforms primarily support English content, with some offering limited capabilities for major European and Asian languages. Translation features vary widely between platforms.

What data privacy protections do these platforms offer when analysing research documents?

Leading platforms maintain privacy policies that prevent sharing uploaded documents and use anonymised data only for improving AI models. Always review each platform's specific privacy terms before uploading sensitive research.

Which AI literature review tools offer institutional subscription options?

Zendy, Litmaps, and R Discovery provide institutional plans with multi-user access and administrative controls, making them suitable for universities and research departments.

From Curator to Digital Navigator: Evolving Roles for Modern Librarians

With the growing integration of digital technologies in academia, librarians are becoming facilitators of discovery. They play a vital role in helping students and researchers find credible information, use digital tools effectively, and develop essential research skills. At Zendy, we believe this shift represents a new chapter for librarians, one where they act as mentors, digital strategists, and AI collaborators. Zendy’s AI-powered research assistant, ZAIA, is one example of how librarians can enhance their work using technology. Librarians can utilise ZAIA to assist users in clarifying research questions, discovering relevant papers more efficiently, and understanding complex academic concepts in simpler terms. This partnership between human expertise and AI efficiency allows librarians to focus more on supporting critical thinking, rather than manual searching. According to our latest survey, AI in Education for Students and Researchers: 2025 Trends and Statistics, over 70% of students now rely on AI for research. Librarians are adapting to this shift by integrating these technologies into their services, offering guidance on ethical AI use, research accuracy, and digital literacy. However, this evolution also comes with challenges. Librarians must ensure users understand how to evaluate AI-generated content, check for biases, and verify sources. The focus is moving beyond access to information, it’s now about ensuring that information is used responsibly and critically. To support this changing role, here are some tools and practices modern librarians can integrate into their workflows: AI-Enhanced DiscoveryUsing tools like ZAIA to help researchers refine queries and find relevant studies faster. Research Data Management Organising, preserving, and curating datasets for long-term academic use. Ethical AI and Digital Literacy Training Teaching researchers how to verify AI outputs, evaluate bias, and maintain academic integrity. Collaborative Digital Spaces Facilitating research communication through online repositories and discussion platforms. In conclusion, librarians today are more than curators, they are digital navigators shaping how knowledge is accessed, evaluated, and shared. As technology continues to evolve, so will its role in guiding researchers and students through the expanding world of digital information. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Nov 25, 202512 Mins ReadDiscover

Strategic AI Skills Every Librarian Must Develop

In 2026, librarians who understand how AI works will be better equipped to support students and researchers, organise collections, and help patrons find reliable information faster. Developing a few key AI skills can make everyday tasks easier and open up new ways to serve your community. Why AI Skills Matter for Librarians AI tools that recommend books, manage citations, or answer basic questions are becoming more common. Learning how these tools work helps librarians: Offer smarter, faster search results. Improve cataloguing accuracy. Provide better guidance to researchers and students. Remember, AI isn’t replacing professional judgment; it’s supporting it. Core AI Literacy Foundations Before diving into specific tools, it helps to understand some basic ideas behind AI. Machine Learning Basics:Machine learning means teaching a computer to recognise patterns in data. In a library setting, this could mean analysing borrowing habits to suggest new titles or resources. Natural Language Processing (NLP):NLP is what allows a chatbot or search tool to understand and respond to human language. It’s how virtual assistants can answer questions like “What are some journals about public health policy?” Quick Terms to Know: Algorithm: A set of steps an AI follows to make a decision. Training Data: The information used to “teach” an AI system. Neural Network: A type of computer model inspired by how the brain processes information. Bias: When data or systems produce unfair or unbalanced results. Metadata Enrichment With AI Cataloguing is one of the areas where AI makes a noticeable difference. Automated Tagging: AI tools can read through titles and abstracts to suggest keywords or subject headings. Knowledge Graphs: These connect related materials, for example, linking a book on climate change with recent journal articles on the same topic. Bias Checking: Some systems can flag outdated or biased terminology in subject classifications. Generative Prompt Skills Knowing how to “talk” to AI tools is a skill in itself. The clearer your request, the better the result. Try experimenting with prompts like these: Research Prompt: “List three recent studies on community reading programs and summarise their findings.” Teaching Prompt: “Write a short activity plan for a workshop on evaluating online information sources.” Summary Prompt: “Give me a brief overview of this article’s key arguments and methods.” Adjusting tone or adding detail can change the outcome. It’s about learning how to guide the tool rather than letting it guess. Ethical Data Practices AI tools can be useful, but they also raise questions about privacy and fairness. Librarians have always cared deeply about protecting patron information, and that remains true with AI. Keep personal data anonymous wherever possible. Review AI outputs for signs of bias or misinformation. Encourage clear policies around how data is stored and used. Ethical AI is part of a librarian’s duty to maintain trust and fairness. Automating Everyday Tasks AI can take over some of the small, routine jobs that fill up a librarian’s day. Circulation: Systems can send overdue reminders automatically or manage renewals. Chatbots: Basic questions like “What are the library hours?” can be handled instantly. Collection Management: AI can spot patterns in borrowing data to suggest which books to keep, reorder, or retire. Building Your Learning Path Getting comfortable with AI doesn’t have to mean earning a new degree. Start small: Take short online courses or micro-certifications in AI literacy. Join librarian groups or online forums where people share practical tips. Block out one hour a week to try out a new tool or attend a webinar. A little consistent learning goes a long way. Making AI Affordable Many smaller libraries worry about cost, but not every tool is expensive. Free Tools: Some open-access AI platforms, like Zendy, offer affordable access to research databases and AI-powered features. Shared Purchases: Partnering with other libraries to share licenses can cut costs. Cloud Services: Pay-as-you-go plans mean you only pay for what you actually use. There’s usually a way to experiment with AI without stretching the budget. Showing Impact Once AI tools are in use, it’s important to show their value. Track things like: Time saved on cataloguing or circulation tasks. Patron feedback on new services. How often are AI tools used compared to manual systems? Numbers matter, but so do stories. Sharing examples, like a student who found research faster thanks to a new search feature, can make your case even stronger. And remember, the future of librarianship is about using AI tools in libraries thoughtfully to keep libraries relevant, reliable, and welcoming spaces for everyone. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 75% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Nov 25, 202511 Mins ReadDiscover

Key Considerations for Training Library Teams on New Research Technologies

The integration of Generative AI into academic life appears to be a significant moment for university libraries. As trusted guides in the information ecosystem, librarians are positioned to help researchers explore this new terrain, but this transition requires developing a fresh set of skills. Training your library team on AI-powered research tools could move beyond technical instruction to focus on critical thinking, ethical understanding, and human judgment. Here is a proposed framework for a training program, organised by the new competencies your team might need to explore. Foundational: Understanding Access and Use This initial module establishes a baseline understanding of the technology itself. Accessing the Platform: Teach the technical steps for using the institution's approved AI tools, including authentication, subscription models, and any specific interfaces (e.g., vendor-integrated AI features in academic databases, institutional LLMs, etc.). Core Mechanics: Explain what a Generative AI platform (like a Large Language Model) is and, crucially, what it is not. Cover foundational concepts like: Training Data: Familiarise staff with how to access the institution’s chosen AI tools, noting any specific authentication requirements or limitations tied to vendor-integrated AI features in academic databases. Prompting Basics: Introduce basic prompt engineering, the art of crafting effective, clear queries to get useful outputs. Hallucinations: Directly address the concept of "hallucinations," or factually incorrect/fabricated outputs and citations, and emphasise the need for human verification. Conceptual: Critical Evaluation and Information Management This module focuses on the librarian's core competency: evaluating information in a new context. Locating and Organising: Train staff on how to use AI tools for practical, time-saving tasks, such as: Generating keywords for better traditional database searches. Summarising long articles to quickly grasp the core argument. Identifying common themes across a set of resources. Evaluating Information: This is perhaps the most critical skill. Teach a new layer of critical information literacy: Source Verification: Always cross-check AI-generated citations, summaries, and facts against reliable, academic sources (library databases, peer-reviewed journals). Bias Identification: Examine AI outputs for subtle biases, especially those related to algorithmic bias in the training data, and discuss how to mitigate this when consulting with researchers. Using and Repurposing: Demonstrate how AI-generated material should be treated—as a raw output that must be heavily edited, critiqued, and cited, not as a final product. Social: Communicating with AI as an Interlocutor The quality of AI output is often dependent on the user’s conversational ability. This module suggests treating the AI platform as a possible partner in a dialogue. Advanced Prompt Engineering: Move beyond basic queries to teach techniques for generating nuanced, high-quality results: Assigning the AI a role (such as a 'sceptical editor' or 'historical analyst') to potentially shape a more nuanced response. Practising iterative conversation, where librarians refine an output by providing feedback and further instructions, treating the interaction as an ongoing intellectual exchange. Shared Understanding: Practise using the platform to help users frame their research questions more effectively. Librarians can guide researchers in using the AI to clarify a vague topic or map out a conceptual framework, turning the tool into a catalyst for deeper thought rather than a final answer generator. Socio-Emotional Awareness: Recognising Impact and Building Confidence This module addresses the human factor, building resilience and confidence Recognising the Impact of Emotions: Acknowledge the possibility of emotional responses, such as uncertainty about shifting professional roles or discomfort with rapid technological change, and facilitate a safe space for dialogue. Knowing Strengths and Weaknesses: Reinforce the unique, human-centric value of the librarian: critical thinking, contextualising information, ethical judgment, and deep disciplinary knowledge, skills that AI cannot replicate. The AI could be seen as a means to automate lower-level tasks, allowing librarians to focus on high-value consultation. Developing Confidence: Implement hands-on, low-stakes practice sessions using real-world research scenarios. Confidence grows from successful interaction, not just theoretical knowledge. Encourage experimentation and a "fail-forward" mentality. Ethical: Acting Ethically as a Digital Citizen Ethical use is the cornerstone of responsible AI adoption in academia. Librarians must be the primary educators on responsible usage. Transparency and Disclosure: Discuss the importance of transparency when utilizing AI. Review institutional and journal guidelines that may require students and faculty to disclose how and when AI was used in their work, and offer guidance on how to properly cite these tools. Data Privacy and Security: Review the potential risks associated with uploading unpublished, proprietary, or personally identifiable information (PII) to public AI services. Establish and enforce clear library policies on what data should never be shared with external tools. Copyright and Intellectual Property (IP): Discuss the murky legal landscape of AI-generated content and IP. Emphasise that AI models are often trained on copyrighted material and that users are responsible for ensuring their outputs do not infringe on existing copyrights. Advocate for using library-licensed, trusted-source AI tools whenever possible. Combating Misinformation: Position the librarian as the essential arbiter against the spread of AI-generated misinformation. Training should include spotting common AI red flags, teaching users how to think sceptically, and promoting the library’s curated, authoritative resources as the gold standard. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Return to blogs

Accelerating Research