Discover

5 Best AI Tools Used in Data Analysis for Research

Jul 29, 2025 |

25 Mins Read

Artificial intelligence is changing how research is done. Today, researchers across subjects use AI tools to help them understand large amounts of data more efficiently.

Whether the data comes from surveys, experiments, or spreadsheets, AI can help organise and analyse it faster than traditional methods. This allows researchers to focus more on the meaning behind the data.

In this article, we introduce five AI tools that are commonly used in data analysis for research: Julius AI, Vizly, ChatGPT-4o, Polymer, and Qlik. Each tool plays a different role in the research process, depending on the type of data and goals of the project.

What is AI data analysis for research?

AI data analysis for research uses artificial intelligence to process and interpret research data. It combines machine learning, natural language processing, and automation to handle complex datasets that would take too long to analyse manually.

Unlike traditional analysis that requires step-by-step programming, AI tools can identify patterns and trends without explicit instructions. This makes data analysis more accessible to researchers without technical backgrounds.

Time efficiency: AI processes large datasets in minutes rather than days
Pattern recognition: Identifies relationships that might be missed in manual review
Error reduction: Minimises human error in repetitive analysis tasks
Accessibility: Makes advanced analysis available to non-technical researchers

For example, a researcher analysing survey responses can use AI to automatically categorise thousands of text answers instead of reading and coding each one individually.

How AI tools are changing research

In the past, researchers spent hours cleaning data, running statistical tests, and creating visualisations. AI tools now automate many of these tasks, freeing up time for thinking about what the results mean.

The volume of research data has grown exponentially in recent years. A single study might include millions of data points from sensors, surveys, or digital records. Traditional analysis methods struggle with this scale, while AI tools can process it efficiently.

AI data analysis also helps researchers spot patterns they might otherwise miss. For instance, machine learning algorithms can identify subtle relationships between variables that aren't obvious in standard statistical tests.

These tools are especially valuable for interdisciplinary research where datasets combine different types of information such as text, numbers, and images.

How to choose the right AI tool in data analysis for research?

Selecting an appropriate AI tool depends on your research needs and technical comfort level. Consider what type of data you're working with and what questions you're trying to answer.

For text-heavy research like literature reviews, tools with strong natural language processing capabilities work best. For numerical data analysis, look for tools that offer statistical modelling and visualisation features.

The learning curve varies between platforms. Some use conversational interfaces where you can ask questions in plain language, while others might require some familiarity with data concepts or programming.

Data privacy is another important consideration, especially when working with sensitive information. Check whether the tool stores your data on their servers and what security measures they have in place.

5 AI tools in data analysis for research

Julius AI

Julius AI works as an AI data analyst that understands questions in everyday language. You can upload spreadsheets or datasets and then ask questions like "What trends do you see?" or "Summarise the key findings."

This conversational approach makes data analysis accessible to researchers without technical backgrounds. The platform handles data cleaning, visualisation, and statistical testing automatically.

Natural language queries: Ask questions about your data in plain English
Automated insights: Identifies patterns and outliers without manual analysis
Visual reporting: Creates charts and graphs based on your questions
Collaborative features: Allow teams to work with the same dataset

Julius AI works well for exploratory data analysis and preliminary research. It helps you understand what's in your data before deciding on more specific analyses.

Vizly

Vizly focuses on turning research data into clear visualisations. The platform uses AI to suggest the most effective ways to display your information based on the data structure.

In addition, Vizly automatically generates charts, graphs, and dashboards. You can then refine these visualisations through a simple drag-and-drop interface.

AI-powered suggestions: Recommends appropriate chart types for your data
Interactive dashboards: Create linked visualisations that update in real time
No-code interface: Builds complex visualisations without programming
Presentation tools: Exports publication-ready graphics for papers and presentations

Vizly is particularly useful for communicating research findings to non-technical audiences and creating visuals for publications or presentations.

ChatGPT-4o

ChatGPT-4o serves as a versatile research assistant that can analyse multiple types of data. You can use it to summarise academic papers, generate code for data analysis, or interpret results.

Unlike specialised data analysis for research tools, ChatGPT-4o can switch between different tasks and data formats. It understands both text and numbers, making it useful for mixed-method research.

Literature analysis: Summarises research papers and identifies key concepts
Code generation: Creates analysis scripts in Python, R, and other languages
Result interpretation: Explains statistical findings in plain language
Multimodal capabilities: Works with text, tables, and images

ChatGPT-4o helps you with various stages of the research process, from literature review to data analysis and writing. However, its outputs should be verified for accuracy in academic contexts.

Polymer

Polymer transforms spreadsheets into interactive dashboards without requiring any coding. Upload your data, and the platform automatically creates a searchable, filterable interface.

This AI tool, specialised in data analysis for research, is helpful for survey data or experimental results that need to be explored from multiple angles. The AI identifies data types and relationships, then builds appropriate visualisations.

One-click dashboards: Converts spreadsheets to interactive displays instantly
Smart filtering: Creates automatic categories and filters based on data content
Sharing capabilities: Allows secure sharing with collaborators or stakeholders
Spreadsheet integration: Works directly with Excel and Google Sheets files

Polymer bridges the gap between raw data and meaningful insights, making it easier for research teams to explore their findings collaboratively.

Qlik

Qlik offers advanced analytics for complex research projects. Its associative data model connects information from multiple sources, allowing you to see relationships across different datasets.

Unlike simpler tools, Qlik includes machine learning capabilities for predictive analysis and pattern recognition. It's designed for researchers working with large, complex datasets who need sophisticated analysis options.

Associative analytics: Reveals connections between different data sources
Predictive modelling: Uses machine learning for forecasting and prediction
Data integration: Combines information from databases, spreadsheets, and apps
Enterprise features: Supports large-scale research with security and governance

Qlik requires more technical knowledge than other AI tools in data analysis for research on this blog, but it offers greater analytical power for complex research questions.

Comparison of AI Data Analysis Tools:

Tool	Best For	Key Strength	Learning Curve	Cost
Julius AI	Conversational analysis	Natural language interface	Low	Subscription
Vizly	Data visualization	Automated chart creation	Low	Freemium
ChatGPT-4o	Versatile assistance	Handles multiple data types	Low-Medium	Subscription
Polymer	Interactive dashboards	No-code spreadsheet analysis	Low	Freemium
Qlik	Complex data projects	Advanced analytics capabilities	Medium-High	Enterprise

Challenges and practical tips for implementation

Data quality considerations

The quality of your data directly affects the accuracy of AI analysis. Common issues include missing values, inconsistent formatting, and outliers that can skew results.

Before using AI tools, take time to clean your dataset by checking for errors and standardising formats. Many AI platforms include data cleaning features, but reviewing the data yourself helps you understand its limitations.

For survey data, look for incomplete responses or inconsistent scales. With numerical data, check for outliers or impossible values that might indicate collection errors.

Privacy and ethical considerations

Research often involves sensitive information that requires careful handling. When using AI tools, consider where your data is stored and who has access to it.

Many platforms offer different privacy options, from fully cloud-based processing to local analysis that keeps data on your own computer. For highly sensitive research, look for tools that provide local processing or strong encryption.

Also, consider whether your research requires ethics approval for data analysis methods. Some institutions have specific guidelines about using AI tools with human subject data.

Integration with research workflows

AI tools work best when they fit naturally into your existing research process. Consider how the tool connects with other software you use, such as reference managers or statistical packages.

Look for platforms that support common file formats like CSV, Excel, or JSON. Some tools also offer direct integration with academic databases or reference managers like Zotero or Mendeley.

For collaborative research, choose tools that allow team members to work together on the same dataset with appropriate access controls.

Empower your research with intelligent data analysis

AI tools are making advanced data analysis more accessible to researchers across disciplines. These platforms handle tasks that once required specialised training, allowing more people to work effectively with complex data.

By automating routine analysis tasks, these tools free up time for the creative and interpretive work that drives research forward. Researchers can focus on asking questions and developing theories rather than managing spreadsheets.

The field continues to evolve, with new capabilities emerging regularly. Future developments will likely include more specialised tools for specific research domains and better integration with the academic publishing process.

Zendy's AI-powered research library complements these analysis tools by providing access to scholarly literature that informs research questions and contexts. Together, these resources help researchers work more efficiently and produce higher-quality results.

FAQs about AI research tools

How do AI tools protect sensitive research data?

Most AI research tools offer security features like encryption and access controls. Some platforms process data locally on your device rather than sending it to external servers. Before uploading sensitive information, review the tool's privacy policy and security certifications to ensure they meet your institution's requirements.

Do I need coding experience to use these AI analysis tools?

Tools like Julius AI, Vizly, and Polymer are designed for researchers without coding skills. They use visual interfaces and natural language processing so you can analyse data through conversation or point-and-click actions. More advanced platforms like Qlik offer both code-free options and features for users with programming experience.

Can these AI tools handle specialised research datasets?

These platforms work with many types of research data, though their capabilities vary. Julius AI and ChatGPT-4o handle text data well, making them useful for qualitative research. Vizly and Polymer excel with structured numerical data from experiments or surveys. Qlik works best with complex, multi-source datasets common in fields like public health or economics.

How accurate are the insights generated by these AI tools?

AI data analysis for research tools provide valuable starting points for analysis, but researchers should verify important findings. The accuracy depends on data quality, appropriate tool selection, and correct interpretation of results. These platforms help identify patterns and generate hypotheses, but critical thinking remains essential for drawing valid research conclusions.

Research Integrity, Partnership, and Societal Impact

Research integrity extends beyond publication to include how scholarship is discovered, accessed, and used, and its societal impact depends on more than editorial practice alone. In practice, integrity and impact are shaped by a web of platforms and partnerships that determine how research actually travels beyond the press. University press scholarship is generally produced with a clear public purpose, speaking to issues such as education, public health, social policy, culture, and environmental change, and often with the explicit aim of informing practice, policy, and public debate. Whether that aim is realised increasingly depends on what happens to research once it leaves the publishing workflow. Discovery platforms, aggregators, library consortia, and technology providers all influence this journey. Choices about metadata, licensing terms, ranking criteria, or the use of AI-driven summarisation affect which research is surfaced, how it is presented, and who encounters it in the first place. These choices can look technical or commercial on the surface, but they have real intellectual and social consequences. They shape how scholarship is understood and whether it can be trusted beyond core academic audiences. For university presses, this changes where responsibility sits. Editorial quality remains critical, but it is no longer the only consideration. Presses also have a stake in how their content is discovered, contextualised, and applied in wider knowledge ecosystems. Long-form and specialist research is particularly exposed here. When material is compressed or broken apart for speed and scale, nuance can easily be lost, even when the intentions behind the system are positive. This is where partnerships start to matter in a very practical way. The conditions under which presses work with discovery services directly affect whether their scholarship remains identifiable, properly attributed, and anchored in its original context. For readers using research in teaching, healthcare, policy, or development settings, these signals are not decorative. They are essential to responsible use. Zendy offers one example of how these partnerships can function differently. As a discovery and access platform serving researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in emerging and underserved markets, Zendy is built around extending reach without undermining trust. University press content is surfaced with clear attribution, structured metadata, and rights-respecting access models that preserve the integrity of the scholarly record. Zendy works directly with publishers to agree how content is indexed, discovered, and, where appropriate, summarised. This gives presses visibility into and control over how their work appears in AI-supported discovery environments, while helping readers approach research with a clearer sense of scope, limitations, and authority. From a societal impact perspective, this matters. Zendy’s strongest usage is concentrated in regions where access to trusted scholarship has long been uneven, including parts of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. In these contexts, university press research is not being read simply for academic interest. It is used in classrooms, clinical settings, policy development, and capacity-building efforts, areas closely connected to the Sustainable Development Goals. Governance really sits at the heart of this kind of model. Clear and shared expectations around metadata quality, content provenance, licensing boundaries, and the use of AI are what make the difference between systems that encourage genuine engagement and those that simply amplify visibility without depth. Metadata is not just a technical layer: it gives readers the cues they need to understand what they are reading, where it comes from, and how it should be interpreted. AI-driven discovery and new access models create real opportunities to broaden the reach of university press publishing and to connect trusted scholarship with communities that would otherwise struggle to access it. But reach on its own does not equate to impact. When context and attribution are lost, the value of the research is diminished. Societal impact depends on whether work is understood and used with care, not simply on how widely it circulates. For presses with a public-interest mission, active participation in partnerships like these is a way to carry their values into a more complex and fast-moving environment. As scholarship is increasingly routed through global, AI-powered discovery systems, questions of integrity, access, and societal relevance converge. Making progress on shared global challenges requires collaboration, shared responsibility, and deliberate choices about the infrastructures that connect research to the wider world. For university presses, this is not a departure from their mission, but a continuation of it, with partnerships playing an essential role. FAQ How do platforms and partnerships affect research integrity?Discovery platforms, aggregators, and technology partners influence which research is surfaced, how it’s presented, and who can access it. Choices around metadata, licensing, and AI summarization directly impact understanding and trust. Why are university press partnerships important?Partnerships allow presses to maintain attribution, context, and control over their content in discovery systems, ensuring that research remains trustworthy and properly interpreted. How does Zendy support presses and researchers?Zendy works with publishers to surface research with clear attribution, structured metadata, and rights-respecting access, preserving integrity while extending reach to underserved regions. For partnership inquiries, please contact: Sara Crowley Vigneau Partnership Relations Manager Email: s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Dec 18, 20256 Mins ReadDiscover

Beyond Publication. Access as a Research Integrity Issue

If research integrity now extends beyond publication to include how scholarship is discovered and used, then access is not a secondary concern. It is foundational. In practice, this broader understanding of integrity quickly runs into a hard constraint: access. A significant percentage of academic publishing is still behind paywalls, and traditional library sales models fail to serve institutions with limited budgetsor uneven digital infrastructure. Even where university libraries exist, access is often delayed or restricted to narrow segments of the scholarly record. The consequences are structural rather than incidental. When researchers and practitioners cannot access the peer-reviewed scholarship they need, it drops out of local research agendas, teaching materials as well as policy conversations. Decisions are then shaped by whatever information is most easily available, not necessarily by what is most rigorous or relevant. Over time, this weakens citation pathways, limits regional participation in scholarly debate, and reinforces global inequity in how knowledge is visible, trusted, and amplified. The ongoing success of shadow libraries highlights this misalignment: Sci-Hub reportedly served over 14 million monthly users in 2025, indicating sustained and widespread demand for academic research that existing access models continue to leave unmet. This is less about individual behaviour than about a system that consistently fails to deliver essential knowledge where it is needed most. The picture looks different when access barriers are reduced: usage data from open and reduced-barrier initiatives consistently show strong engagement across Asia and Africa, particularly in fields linked to health, education, social policy, and development. These patterns highlight how emerging economies rely on high-quality publishing in contexts where it directly impacts professional practice and public decision-making. From a research integrity perspective, this is important. When authoritative sources are inaccessible, alternative materials step in to fill the gap. The risk is not only exclusion, but distortion. Inconsistent, outdated, or unverified sources become more influential precisely because they are easier to obtain. Misinformation takes hold most easily where trusted knowledge is hardest to reach. Addressing access is about more than widening readership or improving visibility, it is about ensuring that high-quality scholarship can continue to shape understanding and decisions in the contexts it seeks to serve. For university presses committed to the public good, this challenge sits across discovery systems, licensing structures, technology platforms, and the partnerships that increasingly determine how research is distributed, interpreted, and reused. If research integrity now extends across the full lifecycle of scholarship, then sustaining it requires collective responsibility and shared frameworks. How presses engage with partners, infrastructures, and governance mechanisms becomes central to protecting both trust and impact. FAQ: What challenges exist in current access models?Many academic works remain behind paywalls, libraries face budget and infrastructure constraints, and access delays or restrictions can prevent researchers from using peer-reviewed scholarship effectively. What happens when research is inaccessible?When trusted sources are hard to reach, alternative, inconsistent, or outdated materials often fill the gap, increasing the risk of misinformation and weakening citation pathways. How does Zendy help address access challenges?Zendy provides affordable and streamlined access to high-quality research, helping scholars, practitioners, and institutions discover and use knowledge without traditional barriers. For partnership inquiries, please contact:Sara Crowley VigneauPartnership Relations ManagerEmail:s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Dec 18, 20255 Mins ReadDiscover

Beyond Peer Review. Research Integrity in University Press Publishing

University presses play a distinctive role in advancing research integrity and societal impact. Their publishing programmes are closely aligned with public-interest research in the humanities, social sciences, global health, education, and environmental studies, disciplines that directly inform policy and progress toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This work typically prioritises depth, context, and long-term understanding, often drawing on regional expertise and interdisciplinary approaches rather than metrics-driven outputs. Research integrity is traditionally discussed in terms of editorial rigour, peer review, and ethical standards in the production of scholarship. These remain essential. But in an era shaped by digital platforms and AI-led discovery, they are no longer sufficient on their own. Integrity now also depends on what happens after publication: how research is surfaced, interpreted, reduced, and reused. For university presses, this shift is particularly significant. Long-form scholarship, a core strength of press programmes, is increasingly encountered through abstracts, summaries, extracts, and automated recommendations rather than sustained reading. As AI tools mediate more first encounters with research, meaning can be subtly altered through selection, compression, or loss of context. These processes are rarely neutral. They encode assumptions about relevance, authority, and value. This raises new integrity questions. Who decides which parts of a work are highlighted or omitted? How are disciplinary nuance and authorial intent preserved when scholarship is summarised? What signals remain to help readers understand scope, limitations, or evidentiary weight? This isn’t to say that AI-driven discovery is inherently harmful, but it does require careful oversight. If university press scholarship is to continue informing research, policy, and public debate in meaningful ways, it needs to remain identifiable, properly attributed, and grounded in its original framing as it moves through increasingly automated discovery systems. In this context, research integrity extends beyond how scholarship is produced to include how it is processed, surfaced and understood. For presses with a public-interest mission, research integrity now extends across the full journey of a work, from how it is published to how it is discovered, interpreted and used. FAQ Can Zendy help with AI-mediated research discovery?Yes. Zendy’s tools help surface, summarise, and interpret research accurately, preserving context and authorial intent even when AI recommendations are used. Does AI discovery harm research, or can it be beneficial?AI discovery isn’t inherently harmful—it can increase visibility and accessibility. However, responsible use is essential to prevent misinterpretation or loss of nuance, ensuring research continues to inform policy and public debate accurately. How does Zendy make research more accessible?Researchers can explore work from multiple disciplines, including humanities, social sciences, global health, and environmental studies, all in one platform with easy search and AI-powered insights. For partnership inquiries, please contact:Sara Crowley Vigneau Partnership Relations Manager Email: s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Return to blogs

Accelerating Research