Discover

5 Best AI Tools Used in Data Analysis for Research

Jul 29, 2025 |

25 Mins Read

Artificial intelligence is changing how research is done. Today, researchers across subjects use AI tools to help them understand large amounts of data more efficiently.

Whether the data comes from surveys, experiments, or spreadsheets, AI can help organise and analyse it faster than traditional methods. This allows researchers to focus more on the meaning behind the data.

In this article, we introduce five AI tools that are commonly used in data analysis for research: Julius AI, Vizly, ChatGPT-4o, Polymer, and Qlik. Each tool plays a different role in the research process, depending on the type of data and goals of the project.

What is AI data analysis for research?

AI data analysis for research uses artificial intelligence to process and interpret research data. It combines machine learning, natural language processing, and automation to handle complex datasets that would take too long to analyse manually.

Unlike traditional analysis that requires step-by-step programming, AI tools can identify patterns and trends without explicit instructions. This makes data analysis more accessible to researchers without technical backgrounds.

Time efficiency: AI processes large datasets in minutes rather than days
Pattern recognition: Identifies relationships that might be missed in manual review
Error reduction: Minimises human error in repetitive analysis tasks
Accessibility: Makes advanced analysis available to non-technical researchers

For example, a researcher analysing survey responses can use AI to automatically categorise thousands of text answers instead of reading and coding each one individually.

How AI tools are changing research

In the past, researchers spent hours cleaning data, running statistical tests, and creating visualisations. AI tools now automate many of these tasks, freeing up time for thinking about what the results mean.

The volume of research data has grown exponentially in recent years. A single study might include millions of data points from sensors, surveys, or digital records. Traditional analysis methods struggle with this scale, while AI tools can process it efficiently.

AI data analysis also helps researchers spot patterns they might otherwise miss. For instance, machine learning algorithms can identify subtle relationships between variables that aren't obvious in standard statistical tests.

These tools are especially valuable for interdisciplinary research where datasets combine different types of information such as text, numbers, and images.

How to choose the right AI tool in data analysis for research?

Selecting an appropriate AI tool depends on your research needs and technical comfort level. Consider what type of data you're working with and what questions you're trying to answer.

For text-heavy research like literature reviews, tools with strong natural language processing capabilities work best. For numerical data analysis, look for tools that offer statistical modelling and visualisation features.

The learning curve varies between platforms. Some use conversational interfaces where you can ask questions in plain language, while others might require some familiarity with data concepts or programming.

Data privacy is another important consideration, especially when working with sensitive information. Check whether the tool stores your data on their servers and what security measures they have in place.

5 AI tools in data analysis for research

Julius AI

Julius AI works as an AI data analyst that understands questions in everyday language. You can upload spreadsheets or datasets and then ask questions like "What trends do you see?" or "Summarise the key findings."

This conversational approach makes data analysis accessible to researchers without technical backgrounds. The platform handles data cleaning, visualisation, and statistical testing automatically.

Natural language queries: Ask questions about your data in plain English
Automated insights: Identifies patterns and outliers without manual analysis
Visual reporting: Creates charts and graphs based on your questions
Collaborative features: Allow teams to work with the same dataset

Julius AI works well for exploratory data analysis and preliminary research. It helps you understand what's in your data before deciding on more specific analyses.

Vizly

Vizly focuses on turning research data into clear visualisations. The platform uses AI to suggest the most effective ways to display your information based on the data structure.

In addition, Vizly automatically generates charts, graphs, and dashboards. You can then refine these visualisations through a simple drag-and-drop interface.

AI-powered suggestions: Recommends appropriate chart types for your data
Interactive dashboards: Create linked visualisations that update in real time
No-code interface: Builds complex visualisations without programming
Presentation tools: Exports publication-ready graphics for papers and presentations

Vizly is particularly useful for communicating research findings to non-technical audiences and creating visuals for publications or presentations.

ChatGPT-4o

ChatGPT-4o serves as a versatile research assistant that can analyse multiple types of data. You can use it to summarise academic papers, generate code for data analysis, or interpret results.

Unlike specialised data analysis for research tools, ChatGPT-4o can switch between different tasks and data formats. It understands both text and numbers, making it useful for mixed-method research.

Literature analysis: Summarises research papers and identifies key concepts
Code generation: Creates analysis scripts in Python, R, and other languages
Result interpretation: Explains statistical findings in plain language
Multimodal capabilities: Works with text, tables, and images

ChatGPT-4o helps you with various stages of the research process, from literature review to data analysis and writing. However, its outputs should be verified for accuracy in academic contexts.

Polymer

Polymer transforms spreadsheets into interactive dashboards without requiring any coding. Upload your data, and the platform automatically creates a searchable, filterable interface.

This AI tool, specialised in data analysis for research, is helpful for survey data or experimental results that need to be explored from multiple angles. The AI identifies data types and relationships, then builds appropriate visualisations.

One-click dashboards: Converts spreadsheets to interactive displays instantly
Smart filtering: Creates automatic categories and filters based on data content
Sharing capabilities: Allows secure sharing with collaborators or stakeholders
Spreadsheet integration: Works directly with Excel and Google Sheets files

Polymer bridges the gap between raw data and meaningful insights, making it easier for research teams to explore their findings collaboratively.

Qlik

Qlik offers advanced analytics for complex research projects. Its associative data model connects information from multiple sources, allowing you to see relationships across different datasets.

Unlike simpler tools, Qlik includes machine learning capabilities for predictive analysis and pattern recognition. It's designed for researchers working with large, complex datasets who need sophisticated analysis options.

Associative analytics: Reveals connections between different data sources
Predictive modelling: Uses machine learning for forecasting and prediction
Data integration: Combines information from databases, spreadsheets, and apps
Enterprise features: Supports large-scale research with security and governance

Qlik requires more technical knowledge than other AI tools in data analysis for research on this blog, but it offers greater analytical power for complex research questions.

Comparison of AI Data Analysis Tools:

Tool	Best For	Key Strength	Learning Curve	Cost
Julius AI	Conversational analysis	Natural language interface	Low	Subscription
Vizly	Data visualization	Automated chart creation	Low	Freemium
ChatGPT-4o	Versatile assistance	Handles multiple data types	Low-Medium	Subscription
Polymer	Interactive dashboards	No-code spreadsheet analysis	Low	Freemium
Qlik	Complex data projects	Advanced analytics capabilities	Medium-High	Enterprise

Challenges and practical tips for implementation

Data quality considerations

The quality of your data directly affects the accuracy of AI analysis. Common issues include missing values, inconsistent formatting, and outliers that can skew results.

Before using AI tools, take time to clean your dataset by checking for errors and standardising formats. Many AI platforms include data cleaning features, but reviewing the data yourself helps you understand its limitations.

For survey data, look for incomplete responses or inconsistent scales. With numerical data, check for outliers or impossible values that might indicate collection errors.

Privacy and ethical considerations

Research often involves sensitive information that requires careful handling. When using AI tools, consider where your data is stored and who has access to it.

Many platforms offer different privacy options, from fully cloud-based processing to local analysis that keeps data on your own computer. For highly sensitive research, look for tools that provide local processing or strong encryption.

Also, consider whether your research requires ethics approval for data analysis methods. Some institutions have specific guidelines about using AI tools with human subject data.

Integration with research workflows

AI tools work best when they fit naturally into your existing research process. Consider how the tool connects with other software you use, such as reference managers or statistical packages.

Look for platforms that support common file formats like CSV, Excel, or JSON. Some tools also offer direct integration with academic databases or reference managers like Zotero or Mendeley.

For collaborative research, choose tools that allow team members to work together on the same dataset with appropriate access controls.

Empower your research with intelligent data analysis

AI tools are making advanced data analysis more accessible to researchers across disciplines. These platforms handle tasks that once required specialised training, allowing more people to work effectively with complex data.

By automating routine analysis tasks, these tools free up time for the creative and interpretive work that drives research forward. Researchers can focus on asking questions and developing theories rather than managing spreadsheets.

The field continues to evolve, with new capabilities emerging regularly. Future developments will likely include more specialised tools for specific research domains and better integration with the academic publishing process.

Zendy's AI-powered research library complements these analysis tools by providing access to scholarly literature that informs research questions and contexts. Together, these resources help researchers work more efficiently and produce higher-quality results.

FAQs about AI research tools

How do AI tools protect sensitive research data?

Most AI research tools offer security features like encryption and access controls. Some platforms process data locally on your device rather than sending it to external servers. Before uploading sensitive information, review the tool's privacy policy and security certifications to ensure they meet your institution's requirements.

Do I need coding experience to use these AI analysis tools?

Tools like Julius AI, Vizly, and Polymer are designed for researchers without coding skills. They use visual interfaces and natural language processing so you can analyse data through conversation or point-and-click actions. More advanced platforms like Qlik offer both code-free options and features for users with programming experience.

Can these AI tools handle specialised research datasets?

These platforms work with many types of research data, though their capabilities vary. Julius AI and ChatGPT-4o handle text data well, making them useful for qualitative research. Vizly and Polymer excel with structured numerical data from experiments or surveys. Qlik works best with complex, multi-source datasets common in fields like public health or economics.

How accurate are the insights generated by these AI tools?

AI data analysis for research tools provide valuable starting points for analysis, but researchers should verify important findings. The accuracy depends on data quality, appropriate tool selection, and correct interpretation of results. These platforms help identify patterns and generate hypotheses, but critical thinking remains essential for drawing valid research conclusions.

From Boolean to Intelligent Search: A Librarian’s Guide to Smarter Information Retrieval

For decades, librarians have been the trusted guides in the vast world of information. But today, that world has grown into something far more complex. Databases multiply, metadata standards evolve, and users expect instant answers. Traditional search still relies on structured logic, keywords, operators, and carefully crafted queries. AI enhances this by interpreting intent rather than just words. Instead of matching text, AI tools for librarians analyse meaning. A researcher looking for “climate change effects on migration” won’t just get papers containing those words, but research exploring environmental displacement, socioeconomic factors, and regional studies. This shift from keyword to context means librarians can spend less time teaching a researcher how to “speak database” and more time helping them evaluate and use the results effectively. The Evolution of Library Search Traditional search engines focus on keywords and often return long lists of potential matches. With AI, libraries can now benefit from search engines that employ natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to understand user queries and map them to the most relevant resources, even when key terms are missing or imprecise. Semantic search, embedding-based retrieval, and vector databases allow AI to find conceptually similar resources and suggest new directions for research. Examples of AI Tools for Librarians AI ToolMain FunctionLibrarian BenefitZendyAI-powered platform offering literature discovery, summarisation, keyphrase highlighting, and PDF analysisSupports researchers with instant insights, simplifies literature reviews, and improves discovery across 40M+ publicationsConsensusAI-powered academic search enginemanaging citation libraries, efficient literature reviewEx Libris PrimoIntegrates AI for discovery and metadata managementImproves record accuracy and user experienceMeilisearchFast, scalable vector search with NLPEnhanced search for large content databases The Ethics of Intelligent Search AI doesn’t just retrieve; it prioritises. AI tools for librarians determine which results appear first, whose research receives visibility, and what remains hidden. This creates ethical questions around transparency and bias. Librarians are uniquely positioned to question those algorithms, advocate for equitable access, and ensure users understand how results are ranked. In an AI-driven world, digital literacy extends beyond knowing how to search—it’s about learning how machines think. In conclusion AI tools for librarians are becoming more accessible. Platforms now integrate summarisation, concept mapping, and citation analysis directly into search. helping librarians and users avoid unreliable content. For libraries, experimenting with these tools can mean faster reference responses, smarter cataloguing, and better support for researchers drowning in information overload. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Oct 10, 202516 Mins ReadDiscover

Why AI like ChatGPT still quotes retracted papers?

AI models like ChatGPT are trained on massive datasets collected at specific moments in time, which means they lack awareness of papers retracted after their training cutoff. When a scientific paper gets retracted, whether due to errors, fraud, or ethical violations, most AI systems continue referencing it as if nothing happened. This creates a troubling scenario where researchers using AI assistants might unknowingly build their work on discredited foundations. In other words: retracted papers are the academic world's way of saying "we got this wrong, please disregard." Yet the AI tools designed to help us navigate research faster often can't tell the difference between solid science and work that's been officially debunked. ChatGPT and other assistants tested Recent studies examined how popular AI research tools handle retracted papers, and the results were concerning. Researchers tested ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and similar language models by asking them about known retracted papers. In many cases, they not only failed to flag the retractions but actively praised the withdrawn studies. One investigation found that ChatGPT referenced retracted cancer imaging research without any warning to users, presenting the flawed findings as credible. The problem extends beyond chatbots to AI-powered literature review tools that researchers increasingly rely on for efficiency. Common failure scenarios The risks show up across different domains, each with its own consequences: Medical guidance: Healthcare professionals consulting AI for clinical information might receive recommendations based on studies withdrawn for data fabrication or patient safety concerns Literature reviews: Academic researchers face citation issues when AI assistants suggest retracted papers, damaging credibility and delaying peer review Policy decisions: Institutional leaders making evidence-based choices might rely on AI-summarised research without realising the underlying studies have been retracted A doctor asking about treatment protocols could unknowingly follow advice rooted in discredited research. Meanwhile, detecting retracted citations manually across hundreds of references proves nearly impossible for most researchers. How Often Retractions Slip Into AI Training Data The scale of retracted papers entering AI systems is larger than most people realise. Crossref, the scholarly metadata registry that tracks digital object identifiers (DOIs) for academic publications, reports thousands of retraction notices annually. Yet many AI models were trained on datasets harvested years ago, capturing papers before retraction notices appeared. Here's where timing becomes critical. A paper published in 2020 and included in an AI training dataset that same year might get retracted in 2023. If the model hasn't been retrained with updated data, it remains oblivious to the retraction. Some popular language models go years between major training updates, meaning their knowledge of the research landscape grows increasingly outdated. Lag between retraction and model update Training Large Language Models requires enormous computational resources and time, which explains why most AI companies don't continuously update their systems. Even when retraining occurs, the process of identifying and removing retracted papers from massive datasets presents technical challenges that many organisations haven't prioritised solving. The result is a growing gap between the current state of scientific knowledge and what AI assistants "know." You might think AI systems could simply check retraction databases in real-time before responding, but most don't. Instead, they generate responses based solely on their static training data, unaware that some information has been invalidated. Risks of Citing Retracted Papers in Practice The consequences of AI-recommended retracted papers extend beyond embarrassment. When flawed research influences decisions, the ripple effects can be substantial and long-lasting. Clinical decision errors Healthcare providers increasingly turn to AI tools for quick access to medical literature, especially when facing unfamiliar conditions or emerging treatments. If an AI assistant recommends a retracted study on drug efficacy or surgical techniques, clinicians might implement approaches that have been proven harmful or ineffective. The 2020 hydroxychloroquine controversy illustrated how quickly questionable research spreads. Imagine that dynamic accelerated by AI systems that can't distinguish between valid and retracted papers. Policy and funding implications Government agencies and research institutions often use AI tools to synthesise large bodies of literature when making funding decisions or setting research priorities. Basing these high-stakes choices on retracted work wastes resources and potentially misdirects entire fields of inquiry. A withdrawn climate study or economic analysis could influence policy for years before anyone discovers the AI-assisted review included discredited research. Academic reputation damage For individual researchers, citing retracted papers carries professional consequences. Journals may reject manuscripts, tenure committees question research rigour, and collaborators lose confidence. While honest mistakes happen, the frequency of such errors increases when researchers rely on AI tools that lack retraction awareness, and the responsibility still falls on the researcher, not the AI. Why Language Models Miss Retraction Signals The technical architecture of most AI research assistants makes them inherently vulnerable to the retraction problem. Understanding why helps explain what solutions might actually work. Corpus quality controls lacking AI models learn from their training corpus, the massive collection of text they analyse during development. Most organisations building these models prioritise breadth over curation, scraping academic databases, preprint servers, and publisher websites without rigorous quality checks. The assumption is that more data produces better models, but this approach treats all papers equally regardless of retraction status. Even when training data includes retraction notices, the AI might not recognise them as signals to discount the paper's content. A retraction notice is just another piece of text unless the model has been specifically trained to understand its significance. Sparse or inconsistent metadata Publishers handle retractions differently, creating inconsistencies that confuse automated systems: Some journals add "RETRACTED" to article titles Others publish separate retraction notices A few quietly remove papers entirely This lack of standardisation means AI systems trained to recognise one retraction format might miss others completely. Metadata، the structured information describing each paper, often fails to consistently flag retraction status across databases. A paper retracted in PubMed might still appear without warning in other indexes that AI training pipelines access. Hallucination and overconfidence AI hallucination occurs when models generate plausible-sounding but false information, and it exacerbates the retraction problem. Even if a model has no information about a topic, it might confidently fabricate citations or misremember details from its training data. This overconfidence means AI assistants rarely express uncertainty about the papers they recommend, leaving users with no indication that additional verification is needed. Real-Time Retraction Data Sources Researchers Should Trust While AI tools struggle with retractions, several authoritative databases exist for manual verification. Researchers concerned about citation integrity can cross-reference their sources against these resources. Retraction Watch Database Retraction Watch operates as an independent watchdog, tracking retractions across all academic disciplines and publishers. Their freely accessible database includes detailed explanations of why papers were withdrawn, from honest error to fraud. The organisation's blog also provides context about patterns in retractions and systemic issues in scholarly publishing. Crossref metadata service Crossref maintains the infrastructure that assigns DOIs to scholarly works, and publishers report retractions through this system. While coverage depends on publishers properly flagging retractions, Crossref offers a comprehensive view across multiple disciplines and publication types. Their API allows developers to build tools that automatically check retraction status, a capability that forward-thinking platforms are beginning to implement. PubMed retracted publication tag For medical and life sciences research, PubMed provides reliable retraction flagging with daily updates. The National Library of Medicine maintains this database with rigorous quality control, ensuring retracted papers receive prominent warning labels. However, this coverage is limited to biomedical literature, leaving researchers in other fields without equivalent resources. DatabaseCoverageUpdate SpeedAccessRetraction WatchAll disciplinesReal-timeFreeCrossrefPublisher-reportedVariableFree APIPubMedMedical/life sciencesDailyFree Responsible AI Starts with Licensing When AI systems access research papers, articles, or datasets, authors and publishers have legal and ethical rights that need protection. Ignoring these rights can undermine the sustainability of the research ecosystem and diminish trust between researchers and technology providers. One of the biggest reasons AI tools get it wrong is that they often cite retracted papers as if they’re still valid. When an article is retracted, e.g. due to peer review process not being conducted properly or failing to meet established standards, most AI systems don’t know, it simply remains part of their training data. This is where licensing plays a crucial role. Licensed data ensures that AI systems are connected to the right sources, continuously updated with accurate, publisher-verified information. It’s the foundation for what platforms like Zendy aim to achieve: making sure the content is clean and trustworthy. Licensing ensures that content is used responsibly. Proper agreements between AI companies and copyright holders allow AI systems to access material legally while providing attribution and, when appropriate, compensation. This is especially important when AI tools generate insights or summaries that are distributed at scale, potentially creating value for commercial platforms without benefiting the sources of the content. in conclusion, consent-driven licensing helps build trust. Publishers and authors can choose whether and how their work is incorporated into AI systems, ensuring that content is included only when rights are respected. Advanced AI platforms, such as Zendy, can even track which licensed sources contributed to a particular output, providing accountability and a foundation for equitable revenue sharing. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Oct 1, 20255 Mins ReadDiscover

5 Tools Every Librarian Should Know in 2025

The role of librarians has always been about connecting people with knowledge. But in 2025, with so much information floating around online, the challenge isn’t access, it’s sorting through the noise and finding what really matters. This is where AI for libraries is starting to make a difference. Here are five that are worth keeping in your back pocket this year. 1. Zendy Zendy is a one-stop AI-powered research library that blends open access with subscription-based resources. Instead of juggling multiple platforms, librarians can point students and researchers to one place where they’ll find academic articles, reports, and AI tools to help with research discovery and literature review. With its growing use of AI for libraries, Zendy makes it easier to summarise research, highlight key ideas, and support literature reviews without adding to the librarian’s workload. 2. LibGuides Still one of the most practical tools for librarians, LibGuides makes it easy to create tailored resource guides for courses, programs, or specific assignments. Whether you’re curating resources for first-year students or putting together a subject guide for advanced research, it helps librarians stay organised while keeping information accessible to learners. 3. OpenRefine Cleaning up messy data is nobody’s favourite job, but it’s a reality when working with bibliographic records or digital archives. OpenRefine is like a spreadsheet, but with superpowers, it can quickly detect duplicates, fix formatting issues, and make large datasets more manageable. For librarians working in cataloguing or digital collections, it saves hours of tedious work. 4. PressReader Library patrons aren’t just looking for academic content; they often want newspapers, magazines, and general reading material too. PressReader gives libraries a simple way to provide access to thousands of publications from around the world. It’s especially valuable in public libraries or institutions with international communities. 5. OCLC WorldShare Managing collections and sharing resources across institutions is a constant task. OCLC WorldShare helps libraries handle cataloguing, interlibrary loans, and metadata management. It’s not flashy, but it makes collaboration between libraries smoother and ensures that resources don’t sit unused when another community could benefit from them. Final thought The tools above aren’t just about technology, they’re about making everyday library work more practical. Whether it’s curating resources with Zendy, cleaning data with OpenRefine, or sharing collections through WorldShare, these platforms help librarians do what they do best: guide people toward knowledge that matters. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Return to blogs

Accelerating Research