z-logo
Discover

Top 6 AI Research Assistant Students Need in 2025

calendarJul 15, 2025 |clock33 Mins Read

AI tools for students are becoming a common part of how students find, read, and understand academic information. These tools are designed to help make research faster, more organised, and easier to manage. As more students rely on digital platforms for learning, AI plays a growing role in academic environments.

AI tools for students

AI tools for students are a specific type of AI tool built to support academic work. They can search through large databases of scholarly content, find relevant papers, summarise complex texts, and help manage citations. Unlike general AI tools, they are trained to focus on academic literature and research tasks.

This article lists the top AI research assistants students are using in 2025, including tools like ZAIA, Elicit, Perplexity AI, Research Rabbit, Scite, ChatGPT, and Connected Papers. Each one serves a different purpose within the research process. The goal is to help students understand what these tools do and how they support academic research.

Why AI Research Assistants Are Essential for Students

Many students struggle with research challenges like limited access to academic journals, difficulty understanding complex language, and spending too much time searching for relevant papers. AI assistants address these issues by providing simplified summaries and streamlining the search process.

These tools are part of a growing trend in AI research for students. They work within AI research libraries to help students access quality academic content without needing special access or advanced research training.

6 Powerful AI Tools for Academic Success

ZAIA

ZAIA is an AI assistant integrated into Zendy's academic library. It gives students access to millions of research articles across different subjects.

AI tools for students
ZAIA

What makes ZAIA stand out is how it simplifies complex academic content:

1. Answers Research Questions

  • You can ask ZAIA anything about a paper, topic, or concept.
  • Example: “What is the main finding of this study?” or “Explain this in simpler terms.”

2. Summarises Academic Papers

  • Provides quick, clear summaries of long or complex research articles.
  • Tailors responses to students, researchers, or professionals.

3. Explains Technical Terms

  • Breaks down jargon, statistics, and methodology into plain language.

4. Generates Insights from PDFs

  • Upload a paper and ask ZAIA for:
    • Key takeaways
    • Strengths and weaknesses
    • Implications of the research

5. Guides Literature Review

  • Suggests related topics or authors.
  • Helps formulate research questions.

A student working on a climate change project can upload journal articles and quickly extract the main findings without reading the entire paper. ZAIA connects to scholarly databases, providing access to both free and subscription-based academic content.

Its main strength is making literature reviews faster by delivering focused results with verified references.

Elicit

Elicit specialises in literature reviews. It searches academic databases to find papers related to specific research questions.

AI tools for students
Elicit

Here’s what Elicit best for:

1. Finds Relevant Papers from Semantic Scholar

  • You can ask a research question (e.g. “What are the effects of mindfulness on anxiety?”), and Elicit returns papers that answer or relate to that question, even if they don’t use the exact same wording.
  • It pulls from Semantic Scholar’s open-access database.

2. Extracts Key Information from Papers

  • Elicit automatically pulls out:
    • Abstracts
    • Sample sizes
    • Interventions
    • Outcomes
    • Methods
  • This helps researchers quickly compare and understand multiple studies.

3. Supports Literature Review Workflows

  • You can organise papers into a table.
  • Customise what columns you want (e.g. population, findings, study design).
  • Useful for identifying patterns, gaps, or summaries across studies.

4. Other Features:

  • Brainstorm hypotheses and related questions
  • Suggests relevant variables or search terms
  • Summarises findings

Limitations:

  • It only accesses open-access papers, mostly from Semantic Scholar.
  • Less effective for very recent, niche, or paywalled research.

Elicit offers a free version with basic features and paid plans starting at $12/month. Its key advantage is evidence synthesis, comparing findings across multiple studies in an organised way.

Perplexity AI

Perplexity AI works like a smart search engine that answers questions with sources. Students can ask complex questions in everyday language instead of searching with keywords.

AI tools for students
Perplexity AI

The tool shows citations alongside its answers, making it easy to check where information comes from. It's available for free, with a Pro version offering additional features.

Perplexity AI excels at handling complicated questions in natural language, making it helpful for exploring new topics or getting quick, sourced answers for assignments.

Research Rabbit

Research Rabbit creates visual maps showing how academic papers connect to each other. This helps students see relationships between studies, authors, and topics.

AI tools for students
Research Rabbit

By entering one paper you already know about, Research Rabbit generates a map of related research. This visual approach helps discover papers you might miss with regular searches. Its core features are:

  1. AI-Powered Paper Discovery
  • Suggests new papers based on your library and reading habits—using citation networks and topic similarity.
  1. Interactive Citation Maps
  • Visualises relationships between papers (citing, cited, similar), and co-author networks in node‑and‑edge maps. 
  1. Personalised Feeds & Alerts
  • Delivers updates when new papers related to your collections or authors are published, without spam.
  1. Collaborative Libraries
  • Enables sharing collections, commenting, and collaborating, supporting teamwork and peer exploration. 
  1. Reference Manager Integration
  • Syncs with Zotero, Mendeley, etc., making it easy to import/export your research

The tool also offers personalised paper recommendations and allows sharing collections with classmates or professors. It's especially useful for understanding how academic conversations have developed over time.

Scite

Scite analyses how research papers are cited by others. This helps students evaluate a paper's credibility by seeing how the academic community has responded to it. For example, a paper with many contrasting citations might have contested findings.

AI tools for students
Scite

Scite features:

1. Smart Citations

  • Scite shows how a paper is cited, not just that it’s cited.
  • It categorises citations into:
    • Supporting (agreeing with the findings)
    • Contrasting (disagreeing with the findings)
    • Mentioning (neutral reference)
  • This gives a clearer picture of a paper’s credibility and influence.

2. Citation Statements in Context

  • You can see the actual sentence in which another paper cited the one you're reading, making it easier to understand how and why it was cited.

3. Research Discovery

  • Scite helps users find high-quality, debated, or under-reviewed papers by showing citation patterns.
  • You can also explore citation networks and related works.

4. Scite Assistant

  • A chatbot-style AI that helps you ask questions and discover relevant research based on Scite’s citation database.

5. Research Dashboards & Reports

  • Used by universities and institutions to analyse research impact, identify experts, or track fields of study.

Scite is particularly valuable for checking if a source is reliable before using it in an assignment. Students can access it through individual or school licenses.

Connected Papers

Connected Papers creates visual graphs showing relationships between research papers. By entering one paper, students get a map of related studies.

AI tools for students
Connected Papers

This tool helps find:

  1. Visual Graph Mapping
    • Builds an interactive graph where each node represents a paper.
    • Node size reflects citation count; colour shading shows publication year
    • Spatial layout shows conceptual similarity—not direct citations—clustered accordingly
  2. Prior & Derivative Works
    • “Prior works” highlights foundational studies cited by the cluster.
    • “Derivative works” surfaces newer papers citing multiple cluster members 
  3. Multi‑Origin Graphs
    • Add additional seed papers to explore intersections across multiple topics 
  4. Export Options
    • Export bibliographic data (e.g., BibTeX) directly for reference managers

Connected Papers is free to use, but doesn't cover every academic journal. Its strength is helping students understand the structure and history of a research topic through visual connections.

How to Choose the Right AI Assistant for Your Needs

Different AI research assistants work better for specific tasks. Here's a simple guide to help you pick the right tool:

TaskBest ToolsWhy
Literature reviewZAIA, ElicitSearch across academic sources with summaries
Quick answersPerplexity AIConversational interface for fast results
Checking source reliabilitySciteShows how papers are cited by others
Finding related papersResearch Rabbit, Connected PapersVisual maps of connected research

Your budget also matters when choosing a tool. Research Rabbit and Connected Papers are completely free. Perplexity AI offers free versions with premium options. ZAIA, Elicit, and Scite have both free features and paid plans with more capabilities.

For students with limited funds, combining free tools can work well. For example, use Connected Papers to discover papers, then use ZAIA to summarise them.

Addressing Credibility and Source Reliability

When using AI research assistants, checking the reliability of information is important. Not all AI tools verify their sources equally well.

To check AI-generated information:

  1. Look for the original source citation
  2. Verify the source exists in academic databases
  3. Confirm the AI accurately represented the source

Some tools focus more on peer-reviewed content than others. ZAIA connects directly to academic databases with verified research. Elicit provides supporting quotes from papers. Scite shows how papers are cited in other academic work.

For academic writing, it's essential to verify any citations an AI provides. Check that the publication exists, the authors are real, and the information matches what the AI claimed. This helps maintain academic integrity while still benefiting from AI assistance.

Time-Saving Strategies With AI Research

AI research assistants can significantly reduce the time spent on academic tasks. Here are some effective combinations of tools:

For a literature review, try this workflow:

  1. Use Connected Papers to identify key papers in your field
  2. Import those papers into Elicit to extract main findings
  3. Use ZAIA to summarise complex papers you need to understand deeply

This approach can reduce initial research time by focusing your reading on the most relevant materials.

Semantic search, used in tools like ZAIA, finds results based on meaning rather than exact keywords. This helps find relevant papers even when they use different terminology. Traditional keyword search only finds exact matches, often missing important related research.

AI summarisation tools extract the main points from research papers, allowing you to review more papers in less time. This is especially helpful when deciding which papers to read in full.

Integrating AI Tools Into Your Research Process

AI research assistants work alongside traditional research methods, they don't replace them. These tools help find and organise information, but students still need to read key papers and form their own understanding of the topic.

Many AI tools connect with citation managers like Zotero, EndNote, or Mendeley. This allows seamless transfer of references and citations between systems, keeping your bibliography organised.

For group projects, some tools support collaborative research. Students can share collections of papers, AI-generated summaries, and notes with team members. This helps maintain consistent understanding across the group.

A simple way to incorporate AI into your research:

  1. Define your research question
  2. Use an AI tool to find relevant papers
  3. Summarise key papers using AI features
  4. Export citations to your citation manager
  5. Organise findings by themes or relevance

Empower Your Research Journey

AI research assistants help students complete academic work more efficiently. They summarise papers, find relevant sources, organise citations, and show connections between studies, reducing time spent on repetitive tasks.

These tools support but don't replace critical thinking. Students still evaluate sources, check accuracy, and form arguments based on evidence. The AI handles information processing, while students focus on understanding and analysis.

The field of AI in academic research continues to develop. Future improvements may include better real-time collaboration, analysis of content in multiple languages, and more personalised recommendations based on your research interests.

Zendy offers a comprehensive research platform that combines AI tools with access to a large academic content library. Its features include summarisation, keyphrase highlighting, and citation organisation, all designed to make research more accessible and efficient.

FAQs About AI Research Assistants

Which AI research assistants work well for students with limited budgets?

Research Rabbit and Connected Papers are completely free. Perplexity AI offers a robust free version with its core features. Zendy provides affordable access to both free and subscription-based academic content through its platform.

How do these AI tools handle different academic subjects?

Coverage varies by tool. Elicit works well for science and medicine, while Connected Papers and Research Rabbit cover most academic fields. Some tools may be less effective for humanities or theoretical subjects where research is more conceptual.

Can AI research assistants access subscription-based academic journals?

Most free AI tools only search publicly available sources. Zendy provides access to subscription-based academic literature at a lower cost through partnerships with publishers, making paywalled content more accessible to students.

Are citations from AI research assistants always accurate?

No. Citations from AI tools should always be verified. Some tools may generate incorrect references or misinterpret sources. It's important to check citations against original sources or academic databases before including them in your work.

You might also like
From Boolean to Intelligent Search: A Librarian’s Guide to Smarter Information Retrieval
Oct 15, 20255 Mins ReadDiscover

From Boolean to Intelligent Search: A Librarian’s Guide to Smarter Information Retrieval

For decades, librarians have been the trusted guides in the vast world of information. But today, that world has grown into something far more complex. Databases multiply, metadata standards evolve, and users expect instant answers. Traditional search still relies on structured logic, keywords, operators, and carefully crafted queries. AI enhances this by interpreting intent rather than just words. Instead of matching text, AI tools for librarians analyse meaning. A researcher looking for “climate change effects on migration” won’t just get papers containing those words, but research exploring environmental displacement, socioeconomic factors, and regional studies. This shift from keyword to context means librarians can spend less time teaching a researcher how to “speak database” and more time helping them evaluate and use the results effectively. The Evolution of Library Search Traditional search engines focus on keywords and often return long lists of potential matches. With AI, libraries can now benefit from search engines that employ natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) to understand user queries and map them to the most relevant resources, even when key terms are missing or imprecise. Semantic search, embedding-based retrieval, and vector databases allow AI to find conceptually similar resources and suggest new directions for research.​ Examples of AI Tools for Librarians AI ToolMain FunctionLibrarian BenefitZendyAI-powered platform offering literature discovery, summarisation, keyphrase highlighting, and PDF analysisSupports researchers with instant insights, simplifies literature reviews, and improves discovery across 40M+ publicationsConsensusAI-powered academic search enginemanaging citation libraries, efficient literature reviewEx Libris PrimoIntegrates AI for discovery and metadata managementImproves record accuracy and user experienceMeilisearchFast, scalable vector search with NLPEnhanced search for large content databases The Ethics of Intelligent Search AI doesn’t just retrieve; it prioritises. AI tools for librarians determine which results appear first, whose research receives visibility, and what remains hidden. This creates ethical questions around transparency and bias. Librarians are uniquely positioned to question those algorithms, advocate for equitable access, and ensure users understand how results are ranked. In an AI-driven world, digital literacy extends beyond knowing how to search—it’s about learning how machines think. In conclusion AI tools for librarians are becoming more accessible. Platforms now integrate summarisation, concept mapping, and citation analysis directly into search. helping librarians and users avoid unreliable content. For libraries, experimenting with these tools can mean faster reference responses, smarter cataloguing, and better support for researchers drowning in information overload. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Why AI like ChatGPT still quotes retracted papers?
Oct 10, 202516 Mins ReadDiscover

Why AI like ChatGPT still quotes retracted papers?

AI models like ChatGPT are trained on massive datasets collected at specific moments in time, which means they lack awareness of papers retracted after their training cutoff. When a scientific paper gets retracted, whether due to errors, fraud, or ethical violations, most AI systems continue referencing it as if nothing happened. This creates a troubling scenario where researchers using AI assistants might unknowingly build their work on discredited foundations. In other words: retracted papers are the academic world's way of saying "we got this wrong, please disregard." Yet the AI tools designed to help us navigate research faster often can't tell the difference between solid science and work that's been officially debunked. ChatGPT and other assistants tested Recent studies examined how popular AI research tools handle retracted papers, and the results were concerning. Researchers tested ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and similar language models by asking them about known retracted papers. In many cases, they not only failed to flag the retractions but actively praised the withdrawn studies. One investigation found that ChatGPT referenced retracted cancer imaging research without any warning to users, presenting the flawed findings as credible. The problem extends beyond chatbots to AI-powered literature review tools that researchers increasingly rely on for efficiency. Common failure scenarios The risks show up across different domains, each with its own consequences: Medical guidance: Healthcare professionals consulting AI for clinical information might receive recommendations based on studies withdrawn for data fabrication or patient safety concerns Literature reviews: Academic researchers face citation issues when AI assistants suggest retracted papers, damaging credibility and delaying peer review Policy decisions: Institutional leaders making evidence-based choices might rely on AI-summarised research without realising the underlying studies have been retracted A doctor asking about treatment protocols could unknowingly follow advice rooted in discredited research. Meanwhile, detecting retracted citations manually across hundreds of references proves nearly impossible for most researchers. How Often Retractions Slip Into AI Training Data The scale of retracted papers entering AI systems is larger than most people realise. Crossref, the scholarly metadata registry that tracks digital object identifiers (DOIs) for academic publications, reports thousands of retraction notices annually. Yet many AI models were trained on datasets harvested years ago, capturing papers before retraction notices appeared. Here's where timing becomes critical. A paper published in 2020 and included in an AI training dataset that same year might get retracted in 2023. If the model hasn't been retrained with updated data, it remains oblivious to the retraction. Some popular language models go years between major training updates, meaning their knowledge of the research landscape grows increasingly outdated. Lag between retraction and model update Training Large Language Models requires enormous computational resources and time, which explains why most AI companies don't continuously update their systems. Even when retraining occurs, the process of identifying and removing retracted papers from massive datasets presents technical challenges that many organisations haven't prioritised solving. The result is a growing gap between the current state of scientific knowledge and what AI assistants "know." You might think AI systems could simply check retraction databases in real-time before responding, but most don't. Instead, they generate responses based solely on their static training data, unaware that some information has been invalidated. Risks of Citing Retracted Papers in Practice The consequences of AI-recommended retracted papers extend beyond embarrassment. When flawed research influences decisions, the ripple effects can be substantial and long-lasting. Clinical decision errors Healthcare providers increasingly turn to AI tools for quick access to medical literature, especially when facing unfamiliar conditions or emerging treatments. If an AI assistant recommends a retracted study on drug efficacy or surgical techniques, clinicians might implement approaches that have been proven harmful or ineffective. The 2020 hydroxychloroquine controversy illustrated how quickly questionable research spreads. Imagine that dynamic accelerated by AI systems that can't distinguish between valid and retracted papers. Policy and funding implications Government agencies and research institutions often use AI tools to synthesise large bodies of literature when making funding decisions or setting research priorities. Basing these high-stakes choices on retracted work wastes resources and potentially misdirects entire fields of inquiry. A withdrawn climate study or economic analysis could influence policy for years before anyone discovers the AI-assisted review included discredited research. Academic reputation damage For individual researchers, citing retracted papers carries professional consequences. Journals may reject manuscripts, tenure committees question research rigour, and collaborators lose confidence. While honest mistakes happen, the frequency of such errors increases when researchers rely on AI tools that lack retraction awareness, and the responsibility still falls on the researcher, not the AI. Why Language Models Miss Retraction Signals The technical architecture of most AI research assistants makes them inherently vulnerable to the retraction problem. Understanding why helps explain what solutions might actually work. Corpus quality controls lacking AI models learn from their training corpus, the massive collection of text they analyse during development. Most organisations building these models prioritise breadth over curation, scraping academic databases, preprint servers, and publisher websites without rigorous quality checks. The assumption is that more data produces better models, but this approach treats all papers equally regardless of retraction status. Even when training data includes retraction notices, the AI might not recognise them as signals to discount the paper's content. A retraction notice is just another piece of text unless the model has been specifically trained to understand its significance. Sparse or inconsistent metadata Publishers handle retractions differently, creating inconsistencies that confuse automated systems: Some journals add "RETRACTED" to article titles Others publish separate retraction notices A few quietly remove papers entirely This lack of standardisation means AI systems trained to recognise one retraction format might miss others completely. Metadata، the structured information describing each paper, often fails to consistently flag retraction status across databases. A paper retracted in PubMed might still appear without warning in other indexes that AI training pipelines access. Hallucination and overconfidence AI hallucination occurs when models generate plausible-sounding but false information, and it exacerbates the retraction problem. Even if a model has no information about a topic, it might confidently fabricate citations or misremember details from its training data. This overconfidence means AI assistants rarely express uncertainty about the papers they recommend, leaving users with no indication that additional verification is needed. Real-Time Retraction Data Sources Researchers Should Trust While AI tools struggle with retractions, several authoritative databases exist for manual verification. Researchers concerned about citation integrity can cross-reference their sources against these resources. Retraction Watch Database Retraction Watch operates as an independent watchdog, tracking retractions across all academic disciplines and publishers. Their freely accessible database includes detailed explanations of why papers were withdrawn, from honest error to fraud. The organisation's blog also provides context about patterns in retractions and systemic issues in scholarly publishing. Crossref metadata service Crossref maintains the infrastructure that assigns DOIs to scholarly works, and publishers report retractions through this system. While coverage depends on publishers properly flagging retractions, Crossref offers a comprehensive view across multiple disciplines and publication types. Their API allows developers to build tools that automatically check retraction status, a capability that forward-thinking platforms are beginning to implement. PubMed retracted publication tag For medical and life sciences research, PubMed provides reliable retraction flagging with daily updates. The National Library of Medicine maintains this database with rigorous quality control, ensuring retracted papers receive prominent warning labels. However, this coverage is limited to biomedical literature, leaving researchers in other fields without equivalent resources. DatabaseCoverageUpdate SpeedAccessRetraction WatchAll disciplinesReal-timeFreeCrossrefPublisher-reportedVariableFree APIPubMedMedical/life sciencesDailyFree Responsible AI Starts with Licensing When AI systems access research papers, articles, or datasets, authors and publishers have legal and ethical rights that need protection. Ignoring these rights can undermine the sustainability of the research ecosystem and diminish trust between researchers and technology providers. One of the biggest reasons AI tools get it wrong is that they often cite retracted papers as if they’re still valid. When an article is retracted, e.g. due to peer review process not being conducted properly or failing to meet established standards, most AI systems don’t know, it simply remains part of their training data. This is where licensing plays a crucial role. Licensed data ensures that AI systems are connected to the right sources, continuously updated with accurate, publisher-verified information. It’s the foundation for what platforms like Zendy aim to achieve: making sure the content is clean and trustworthy.  Licensing ensures that content is used responsibly. Proper agreements between AI companies and copyright holders allow AI systems to access material legally while providing attribution and, when appropriate, compensation. This is especially important when AI tools generate insights or summaries that are distributed at scale, potentially creating value for commercial platforms without benefiting the sources of the content. in conclusion, consent-driven licensing helps build trust. Publishers and authors can choose whether and how their work is incorporated into AI systems, ensuring that content is included only when rights are respected. Advanced AI platforms, such as Zendy, can even track which licensed sources contributed to a particular output, providing accountability and a foundation for equitable revenue sharing. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

5 Tools Every Librarian Should Know in 2025
Oct 1, 20255 Mins ReadDiscover

5 Tools Every Librarian Should Know in 2025

The role of librarians has always been about connecting people with knowledge. But in 2025, with so much information floating around online, the challenge isn’t access, it’s sorting through the noise and finding what really matters. This is where AI for libraries is starting to make a difference. Here are five that are worth keeping in your back pocket this year. 1. Zendy Zendy is a one-stop AI-powered research library that blends open access with subscription-based resources. Instead of juggling multiple platforms, librarians can point students and researchers to one place where they’ll find academic articles, reports, and AI tools to help with research discovery and literature review. With its growing use of AI for libraries, Zendy makes it easier to summarise research, highlight key ideas, and support literature reviews without adding to the librarian’s workload. 2. LibGuides Still one of the most practical tools for librarians, LibGuides makes it easy to create tailored resource guides for courses, programs, or specific assignments. Whether you’re curating resources for first-year students or putting together a subject guide for advanced research, it helps librarians stay organised while keeping information accessible to learners. 3. OpenRefine Cleaning up messy data is nobody’s favourite job, but it’s a reality when working with bibliographic records or digital archives. OpenRefine is like a spreadsheet, but with superpowers, it can quickly detect duplicates, fix formatting issues, and make large datasets more manageable. For librarians working in cataloguing or digital collections, it saves hours of tedious work. 4. PressReader Library patrons aren’t just looking for academic content; they often want newspapers, magazines, and general reading material too. PressReader gives libraries a simple way to provide access to thousands of publications from around the world. It’s especially valuable in public libraries or institutions with international communities. 5. OCLC WorldShare Managing collections and sharing resources across institutions is a constant task. OCLC WorldShare helps libraries handle cataloguing, interlibrary loans, and metadata management. It’s not flashy, but it makes collaboration between libraries smoother and ensures that resources don’t sit unused when another community could benefit from them. Final thought The tools above aren’t just about technology, they’re about making everyday library work more practical. Whether it’s curating resources with Zendy, cleaning data with OpenRefine, or sharing collections through WorldShare, these platforms help librarians do what they do best: guide people toward knowledge that matters. .wp-block-image img { max-width: 85% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom