Discover

Strategic AI Skills Every Librarian Must Develop

Nov 25, 2025 |

12 Mins Read

In 2026, librarians who understand how AI works will be better equipped to support students and researchers, organise collections, and help patrons find reliable information faster. Developing a few key AI skills can make everyday tasks easier and open up new ways to serve your community.

Why AI Skills Matter for Librarians

AI tools that recommend books, manage citations, or answer basic questions are becoming more common.

Learning how these tools work helps librarians:

Offer smarter, faster search results.
Improve cataloguing accuracy.
Provide better guidance to researchers and students.

Remember, AI isn’t replacing professional judgment; it’s supporting it.

Core AI Literacy Foundations

Before diving into specific tools, it helps to understand some basic ideas behind AI.

Machine Learning Basics:
Machine learning means teaching a computer to recognise patterns in data. In a library setting, this could mean analysing borrowing habits to suggest new titles or resources.

Natural Language Processing (NLP):
NLP is what allows a chatbot or search tool to understand and respond to human language. It’s how virtual assistants can answer questions like “What are some journals about public health policy?”

Quick Terms to Know:

Algorithm: A set of steps an AI follows to make a decision.
Training Data: The information used to “teach” an AI system.
Neural Network: A type of computer model inspired by how the brain processes information.
Bias: When data or systems produce unfair or unbalanced results.

Metadata Enrichment With AI

Cataloguing is one of the areas where AI makes a noticeable difference.

Automated Tagging: AI tools can read through titles and abstracts to suggest keywords or subject headings.
Knowledge Graphs: These connect related materials, for example, linking a book on climate change with recent journal articles on the same topic.
Bias Checking: Some systems can flag outdated or biased terminology in subject classifications.

Generative Prompt Skills

Knowing how to “talk” to AI tools is a skill in itself. The clearer your request, the better the result. Try experimenting with prompts like these:

Research Prompt: “List three recent studies on community reading programs and summarise their findings.”
Teaching Prompt: “Write a short activity plan for a workshop on evaluating online information sources.”
Summary Prompt: “Give me a brief overview of this article’s key arguments and methods.”

Adjusting tone or adding detail can change the outcome. It’s about learning how to guide the tool rather than letting it guess.

Ethical Data Practices

AI tools can be useful, but they also raise questions about privacy and fairness. Librarians have always cared deeply about protecting patron information, and that remains true with AI.

Keep personal data anonymous wherever possible.
Review AI outputs for signs of bias or misinformation.
Encourage clear policies around how data is stored and used.

Ethical AI is part of a librarian’s duty to maintain trust and fairness.

Automating Everyday Tasks

AI can take over some of the small, routine jobs that fill up a librarian’s day.

Circulation: Systems can send overdue reminders automatically or manage renewals.
Chatbots: Basic questions like “What are the library hours?” can be handled instantly.
Collection Management: AI can spot patterns in borrowing data to suggest which books to keep, reorder, or retire.

Building Your Learning Path

Getting comfortable with AI doesn’t have to mean earning a new degree. Start small:

Take short online courses or micro-certifications in AI literacy.
Join librarian groups or online forums where people share practical tips.
Block out one hour a week to try out a new tool or attend a webinar.

A little consistent learning goes a long way.

Making AI Affordable

Many smaller libraries worry about cost, but not every tool is expensive.

Free Tools: Some open-access AI platforms, like Zendy, offer affordable access to research databases and AI-powered features.
Shared Purchases: Partnering with other libraries to share licenses can cut costs.
Cloud Services: Pay-as-you-go plans mean you only pay for what you actually use.

There’s usually a way to experiment with AI without stretching the budget.

Showing Impact

Once AI tools are in use, it’s important to show their value. Track things like:

Time saved on cataloguing or circulation tasks.
Patron feedback on new services.
How often are AI tools used compared to manual systems?

Numbers matter, but so do stories. Sharing examples, like a student who found research faster thanks to a new search feature, can make your case even stronger.

And remember, the future of librarianship is about using AI tools in libraries thoughtfully to keep libraries relevant, reliable, and welcoming spaces for everyone.

Research Integrity, Partnership, and Societal Impact

Research integrity extends beyond publication to include how scholarship is discovered, accessed, and used, and its societal impact depends on more than editorial practice alone. In practice, integrity and impact are shaped by a web of platforms and partnerships that determine how research actually travels beyond the press. University press scholarship is generally produced with a clear public purpose, speaking to issues such as education, public health, social policy, culture, and environmental change, and often with the explicit aim of informing practice, policy, and public debate. Whether that aim is realised increasingly depends on what happens to research once it leaves the publishing workflow. Discovery platforms, aggregators, library consortia, and technology providers all influence this journey. Choices about metadata, licensing terms, ranking criteria, or the use of AI-driven summarisation affect which research is surfaced, how it is presented, and who encounters it in the first place. These choices can look technical or commercial on the surface, but they have real intellectual and social consequences. They shape how scholarship is understood and whether it can be trusted beyond core academic audiences. For university presses, this changes where responsibility sits. Editorial quality remains critical, but it is no longer the only consideration. Presses also have a stake in how their content is discovered, contextualised, and applied in wider knowledge ecosystems. Long-form and specialist research is particularly exposed here. When material is compressed or broken apart for speed and scale, nuance can easily be lost, even when the intentions behind the system are positive. This is where partnerships start to matter in a very practical way. The conditions under which presses work with discovery services directly affect whether their scholarship remains identifiable, properly attributed, and anchored in its original context. For readers using research in teaching, healthcare, policy, or development settings, these signals are not decorative. They are essential to responsible use. Zendy offers one example of how these partnerships can function differently. As a discovery and access platform serving researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in emerging and underserved markets, Zendy is built around extending reach without undermining trust. University press content is surfaced with clear attribution, structured metadata, and rights-respecting access models that preserve the integrity of the scholarly record. Zendy works directly with publishers to agree how content is indexed, discovered, and, where appropriate, summarised. This gives presses visibility into and control over how their work appears in AI-supported discovery environments, while helping readers approach research with a clearer sense of scope, limitations, and authority. From a societal impact perspective, this matters. Zendy’s strongest usage is concentrated in regions where access to trusted scholarship has long been uneven, including parts of Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. In these contexts, university press research is not being read simply for academic interest. It is used in classrooms, clinical settings, policy development, and capacity-building efforts, areas closely connected to the Sustainable Development Goals. Governance really sits at the heart of this kind of model. Clear and shared expectations around metadata quality, content provenance, licensing boundaries, and the use of AI are what make the difference between systems that encourage genuine engagement and those that simply amplify visibility without depth. Metadata is not just a technical layer: it gives readers the cues they need to understand what they are reading, where it comes from, and how it should be interpreted. AI-driven discovery and new access models create real opportunities to broaden the reach of university press publishing and to connect trusted scholarship with communities that would otherwise struggle to access it. But reach on its own does not equate to impact. When context and attribution are lost, the value of the research is diminished. Societal impact depends on whether work is understood and used with care, not simply on how widely it circulates. For presses with a public-interest mission, active participation in partnerships like these is a way to carry their values into a more complex and fast-moving environment. As scholarship is increasingly routed through global, AI-powered discovery systems, questions of integrity, access, and societal relevance converge. Making progress on shared global challenges requires collaboration, shared responsibility, and deliberate choices about the infrastructures that connect research to the wider world. For university presses, this is not a departure from their mission, but a continuation of it, with partnerships playing an essential role. FAQ How do platforms and partnerships affect research integrity?Discovery platforms, aggregators, and technology partners influence which research is surfaced, how it’s presented, and who can access it. Choices around metadata, licensing, and AI summarization directly impact understanding and trust. Why are university press partnerships important?Partnerships allow presses to maintain attribution, context, and control over their content in discovery systems, ensuring that research remains trustworthy and properly interpreted. How does Zendy support presses and researchers?Zendy works with publishers to surface research with clear attribution, structured metadata, and rights-respecting access, preserving integrity while extending reach to underserved regions. For partnership inquiries, please contact: Sara Crowley Vigneau Partnership Relations Manager Email: s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Dec 18, 20256 Mins ReadDiscover

Beyond Publication. Access as a Research Integrity Issue

If research integrity now extends beyond publication to include how scholarship is discovered and used, then access is not a secondary concern. It is foundational. In practice, this broader understanding of integrity quickly runs into a hard constraint: access. A significant percentage of academic publishing is still behind paywalls, and traditional library sales models fail to serve institutions with limited budgetsor uneven digital infrastructure. Even where university libraries exist, access is often delayed or restricted to narrow segments of the scholarly record. The consequences are structural rather than incidental. When researchers and practitioners cannot access the peer-reviewed scholarship they need, it drops out of local research agendas, teaching materials as well as policy conversations. Decisions are then shaped by whatever information is most easily available, not necessarily by what is most rigorous or relevant. Over time, this weakens citation pathways, limits regional participation in scholarly debate, and reinforces global inequity in how knowledge is visible, trusted, and amplified. The ongoing success of shadow libraries highlights this misalignment: Sci-Hub reportedly served over 14 million monthly users in 2025, indicating sustained and widespread demand for academic research that existing access models continue to leave unmet. This is less about individual behaviour than about a system that consistently fails to deliver essential knowledge where it is needed most. The picture looks different when access barriers are reduced: usage data from open and reduced-barrier initiatives consistently show strong engagement across Asia and Africa, particularly in fields linked to health, education, social policy, and development. These patterns highlight how emerging economies rely on high-quality publishing in contexts where it directly impacts professional practice and public decision-making. From a research integrity perspective, this is important. When authoritative sources are inaccessible, alternative materials step in to fill the gap. The risk is not only exclusion, but distortion. Inconsistent, outdated, or unverified sources become more influential precisely because they are easier to obtain. Misinformation takes hold most easily where trusted knowledge is hardest to reach. Addressing access is about more than widening readership or improving visibility, it is about ensuring that high-quality scholarship can continue to shape understanding and decisions in the contexts it seeks to serve. For university presses committed to the public good, this challenge sits across discovery systems, licensing structures, technology platforms, and the partnerships that increasingly determine how research is distributed, interpreted, and reused. If research integrity now extends across the full lifecycle of scholarship, then sustaining it requires collective responsibility and shared frameworks. How presses engage with partners, infrastructures, and governance mechanisms becomes central to protecting both trust and impact. FAQ: What challenges exist in current access models?Many academic works remain behind paywalls, libraries face budget and infrastructure constraints, and access delays or restrictions can prevent researchers from using peer-reviewed scholarship effectively. What happens when research is inaccessible?When trusted sources are hard to reach, alternative, inconsistent, or outdated materials often fill the gap, increasing the risk of misinformation and weakening citation pathways. How does Zendy help address access challenges?Zendy provides affordable and streamlined access to high-quality research, helping scholars, practitioners, and institutions discover and use knowledge without traditional barriers. For partnership inquiries, please contact:Sara Crowley VigneauPartnership Relations ManagerEmail:s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Dec 18, 20255 Mins ReadDiscover

Beyond Peer Review. Research Integrity in University Press Publishing

University presses play a distinctive role in advancing research integrity and societal impact. Their publishing programmes are closely aligned with public-interest research in the humanities, social sciences, global health, education, and environmental studies, disciplines that directly inform policy and progress toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This work typically prioritises depth, context, and long-term understanding, often drawing on regional expertise and interdisciplinary approaches rather than metrics-driven outputs. Research integrity is traditionally discussed in terms of editorial rigour, peer review, and ethical standards in the production of scholarship. These remain essential. But in an era shaped by digital platforms and AI-led discovery, they are no longer sufficient on their own. Integrity now also depends on what happens after publication: how research is surfaced, interpreted, reduced, and reused. For university presses, this shift is particularly significant. Long-form scholarship, a core strength of press programmes, is increasingly encountered through abstracts, summaries, extracts, and automated recommendations rather than sustained reading. As AI tools mediate more first encounters with research, meaning can be subtly altered through selection, compression, or loss of context. These processes are rarely neutral. They encode assumptions about relevance, authority, and value. This raises new integrity questions. Who decides which parts of a work are highlighted or omitted? How are disciplinary nuance and authorial intent preserved when scholarship is summarised? What signals remain to help readers understand scope, limitations, or evidentiary weight? This isn’t to say that AI-driven discovery is inherently harmful, but it does require careful oversight. If university press scholarship is to continue informing research, policy, and public debate in meaningful ways, it needs to remain identifiable, properly attributed, and grounded in its original framing as it moves through increasingly automated discovery systems. In this context, research integrity extends beyond how scholarship is produced to include how it is processed, surfaced and understood. For presses with a public-interest mission, research integrity now extends across the full journey of a work, from how it is published to how it is discovered, interpreted and used. FAQ Can Zendy help with AI-mediated research discovery?Yes. Zendy’s tools help surface, summarise, and interpret research accurately, preserving context and authorial intent even when AI recommendations are used. Does AI discovery harm research, or can it be beneficial?AI discovery isn’t inherently harmful—it can increase visibility and accessibility. However, responsible use is essential to prevent misinterpretation or loss of nuance, ensuring research continues to inform policy and public debate accurately. How does Zendy make research more accessible?Researchers can explore work from multiple disciplines, including humanities, social sciences, global health, and environmental studies, all in one platform with easy search and AI-powered insights. For partnership inquiries, please contact:Sara Crowley Vigneau Partnership Relations Manager Email: s.crowleyvigneau@zendy.io .wp-block-image img { max-width: 65% !important; margin-left: auto !important; margin-right: auto !important; }

Return to blogs

Accelerating Research