Open AccessCritical Analysis of Corneal Cross-linking (Part-II): Resolving the Controversial Issues (Theory versus Measurements)
Author(s) -
Jenn-Wei Lin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
ophthalmology research: an international journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2321-7227
DOI - 10.9734/or/2021/v15i130204
Subject(s) - riboflavin , intensity (physics) , light intensity , chemistry , optics , ophthalmology , mathematics , medicine , physics , biochemistry
Aims: To resolve the controversial issues of UV-light-initiated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) by theoretical formulas and measured clinical outcomes.
Study Design: Analysis and measured data of CXL.
Place and Duration of Study: New Vision Inc, Taipei, between June 2021 and August 2021.
Methodology: The controversial issues are addressed and resolved by analytical formulas including: the validation of Bunsen Roscoe law (BRL), the cutoff light intensity, the minimum corneal thickness, the demarcation line depth, the role of oxygen and riboflavin concentration. The overall CXL efficacy is governed by UV-A light intensity, dose, exposure time, mode of exposure (pulsed or CW), the riboflavin concentration, diffusion and drops pre-operation and interoperation administration, the concentration of oxygen in the stromal tissue (pre-op and inter-op), and environmental conditions. The length of the riboflavin presoaking time and viscosity of the riboflavin film also affect the crosslink depth. Analytic formulas are derived for the scaling laws for type-I and type-II efficacy, given by the square root of light intensity, and light dose, respectively.
Conclusion: The controversial issues of CXL may be partially resolved via analytic formulas, and compared with measurements. The scaling laws of type-I and type-II efficacy are different and given by analytic formulas. Our formulas also predict the maximum light intensity and the minimum corneal thickness, which are consistent with measurements.