
Result of Ring Fixator in High-energy Schatzker Type VI Fractures of Proximal Tibia
Author(s) -
Aftab Alam Khanzada,
Muhammad Rafique Joyo,
Muhammad Umar Javed,
Nizam Ahmed,
Niaz Hussain Keerio,
Ghazanfar Ali Shah,
Syed Shahid Noor
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of pharmaceutical research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2456-9119
DOI - 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i43b32574
Subject(s) - medicine , limp , surgery , tibia , soft tissue , external fixator , high energy , deformity , orthodontics , engineering physics , engineering
Background: Significant articular depression, separation of both condyles, diaphyseal comminution and dissociation, and loss of soft-tissue envelope integrity are all associated with high-energy proximal tibia fractures (Schatzker VI). Over the past 50 years, there has been a lot of research on plating problems in these complicated fractures. For the care of these complex injuries, Ilizarov devised a new method (ring fixator).
Aim of the Study: To examine the outcomes of patients who received a ring fixator for the treatment of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (Schatzker VI).
Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients (mean age 36) were treated with the Ilizarov fixator and transfixion wires for high-energy fractures of the proximal tibia (Schatzker VI). Nine of the patients had open fractures, and five of them had significant soft tissue damage. They were all tracked for an average of 19.4 months. The result was analyzed using the criteria set by Honkonen & Jarvinen (1992).
Results: Thirteen fractures healed in an average of 14.6 weeks, with one taking six months. Twelve patients recovered complete extension, while eight others regained more than 110 degrees of flexion. All of the patients knees were stable, except one who had a minor varus deformity. Nine patients walked normally, while four had a little limp. Except for one, all of the knees exhibited an articular step-off of less than 4 mm and normal axial alignment. Six knees were found to be outstanding, five to be decent, and three to be fair. There were no instances of postoperative skin infection or septic arthritis, however, three patients did have a pin tract infection that was effectively managed.
Conclusion: The technique is suitable for the treatment of complex proximal tibia fractures when there is substantial comminution at the fracture site as well as soft tissue damage (Schatzker VI).