Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube in Adults Selected for Elective Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery | Zendy

Narendran Karthigayan | Zendy

Open Access

Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube in Adults Selected for Elective Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

Author(s) -

Narendran Karthigayan

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

journal of pharmaceutical research international

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2456-9119

DOI - 10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i40b32293

Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , anesthesia , endotracheal tube , endotracheal intubation , laryngeal mask airway , airway , elective surgery , significant difference , airway management , tracheal intubation , surgery , laparoscopic surgery , laparoscopy

Both PLMA and SLIPA were easy to insert (100% success) and ventilate with maximum sealing pressure of 30cm H2o (P = 0.4) with no muscle relaxant. No significant difference (P = 0.265) in intubation time between PLMA and ETT were observed in the study. A significant SpO2 change (P = 0.804, 0.561, 0.657, 0.248, 0.561) measured Pre op, Pre intubation, lmt, 3 mt and 5mts after intubation and there were no significant EtCO2 changes (P =0.861, 0.251, 0.44) measured after intubation was observed. Blood staining in 1/25 cases with PLMA and 2/25 cases with ETT with a P value of 0.561was seen.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research