Open AccessComparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Newer Irrigating Solutions in the Removal of Smear Layer Using SEM
Author(s) -
Srivalli Podili,
P Krishna Prasad,
T. B. V. G. Raju,
Mahendra Varma Nadimpalli,
Gowtam Dev Dondapati,
Thangi Sowjanya
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of pharmaceutical research international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2456-9119
DOI - 10.9734/jpri/2020/v32i4131045
Subject(s) - smear layer , sodium hypochlorite , phytic acid , coronal plane , dentistry , root canal , saline , significant difference , chemistry , irrigation , materials science , medicine , biology , food science , agronomy , organic chemistry , radiology
Aim: To compare the effect of EDTA, Phytic acid and Peracitic acid on smear layer removal by effective conventional irrigation.
Materials and Methodology: A total of 50 extracted mandibular premolars were selected. The canals were instrumented by rotary system up to F2 ProTaper and irrigated with 3% NaOCL simultaneously, teeth were divided into 4 groups according to the final irrigants: 17% EDTA; 2.25% PERACITIC ACID; 1% Phytic Acid; and saline. The canals were irrigated with 25 guage side vented needles for 5 minutes. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Smear layer removal was evaluated at coronal, middle and apical thirds of the root canal. The data is analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Results: In this study, the control group that is normal saline (4.05 ± 1.06) showed very less amount of smear layer removal. The highest amount of smear layer removal was seen in the group with phytic acid followed by peracitic acid and sodium hypochlorite groups. The apical third showed significantly more smear layer than the coronal and middle thirds (p 0.05).
Conclusion: 1% phytic acid was the most effective in removing the smear layer at each level of the root canal followed by 2.5% peracitic and 17% EDTA.