Premium
Detection of Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Using Transcranial Color‐Coded Duplex Sonography, Computed Tomographic Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Author(s) -
Roubec Martin,
Kuliha Martin,
Jonszta Tomáš,
Procházka Václav,
Fadrná Táňa,
Filip Michal,
Kaňovský Petr,
Langová Kateřina,
Herzig Roman,
Školoudík David
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2011.30.8.1069
Subject(s) - medicine , digital subtraction angiography , radiology , angiography , subtraction , stenosis , image subtraction , computed tomographic angiography , artificial intelligence , binary image , mathematics , arithmetic , computer science , image (mathematics) , image processing
Objectives The aim of this retrospective study was to compare intracranial arterial stenosis in patients with stroke using 3 different methods: transcranial color‐coded duplex sonography, computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in a common clinical practice. Methods Sixty‐seven patients (47 male and 20 female; age range, 23–79 years; mean age ± SD, 62.0 ± 9.5 years) were enrolled in this study over 40 months. All patients underwent examinations of the intracranial arteries using transcranial color‐coded sonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Findings were divided into 4 groups: normal, mild stenosis (<50%), severe stenosis (50%–99%), and occlusion. Results Because of technical reasons or an insufficient bone window, 465 of 536 arterial segments in 67 patients were evaluated; 12 stenotic and 15 occluded segments were detected using digital subtraction angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of transcranial color‐coded sonography and CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard were 88.9%, 94.8%, 51.1%, and 99.3% and 81.5%, 98.7%, 78.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. The agreement between transcranial color‐coded sonography and CT angiography was 93.8% (κ = 0.559); between transcranial color‐coded sonography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 93.9% (κ = 0.588); and between CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 96.6% (κ = 0.697). Conclusions Moderate agreement was found between CT angiography, transcranial color‐coded sonography, and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of intracranial stenosis. Computed tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography are sufficient for assessment of the diagnosis.