z-logo
Premium
Ultrasonography Is Superior to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining Superficial Resection Margins of Malignant Chest Wall Tumors
Author(s) -
Briccoli Antonio,
Galletti Stefano,
Salone Mariacristina,
Morganti Angelo,
Pelotti Patrizia,
Rocca Michele
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2007.26.2.157
Subject(s) - medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , ultrasonography , scintigraphy , sarcoma , tomography , ultrasound , nuclear medicine , pathology
Objective The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze results obtained in 22 patients affected by malignant high‐grade chest wall tumors evaluated preoperatively by ultrasonography as well as other imaging techniques. Methods Twenty‐two patients with chest wall high‐grade sarcomas routinely underwent computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, total body scintigraphy, and ultrasonography. Ultrasonography was always performed by the same person using an ultrasonography system with a 5‐ to 13‐MHz probe and with color Doppler evaluation of the lesion. Scans were done with the patient positioned as during surgery. Tumor lateral margins were identified, and a line was marked at 4 cm. In 8 patients with local recurrence, the presence of micronodules was also studied. Results of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography were compared with the surgical specimens. Results Histologically, all surgical specimens excised according to ultrasonographic margins showed wide margins. Ultrasonography showed micronodules in 6 of 8 patients with local recurrence; histologically, they were all identified as sarcoma nodules. Ultrasonography failed in particular with cervical‐mediastinal vessels. Conclusions Our results confirm that ultrasonography is feasible and reliable in the study of superficial margins and for detection of micronodules of less than 0.5 cm in diameter.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here