Premium
Measurement of Volumetric Flow
Author(s) -
Kripfgans Oliver D.,
Rubin Jonathan M.,
Hall Anne L.,
Gordon Michael B.,
Fowlkes J. Brian
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2006.25.10.1305
Subject(s) - volumetric flow rate , pulsatile flow , medicine , flow (mathematics) , volume (thermodynamics) , confidence interval , biomedical engineering , imaging phantom , flow measurement , doppler effect , nuclear medicine , doppler ultrasound , tube (container) , range (aeronautics) , mechanics , materials science , surgery , physics , quantum mechanics , astronomy , cardiology , composite material
Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3‐dimensional (3D) sonographic method for the measurement of volumetric flow under conditions of known flow rates and Doppler angles. Methods. A GE/Kretz Voluson 730 system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) and RAB2‐5 probe were used to acquire 3D Doppler measurements in a custom flow phantom. Blood‐mimicking fluid circulated by a computer‐controlled pump provided a range of flow velocities (2–15 mL/s). A 6‐axis positioning system maneuvered the ultrasound probe through a range of angles (40°–70° and 110°–140°) with respect to the tube (orthogonal to the tube being 90°). Volume data sets were obtained spanning 29° lateral and 20° elevational angles encompassing the flow tube in a scanning time of less than 10 seconds. Power Doppler data were used to correct for partial volume effects. Results. Using a single angle (110°) with respect to the flow tube, measured and actual volume flow rates were within the 95% confidence interval over the full range of flow rates. At flow rates of 5 and 10 mL/s, the measured volume flow rates were all within ±15% of actual values for the range of angles tested and also stayed within the 95% confidence interval. Conclusions. Direct comparisons of volume flow rates estimated with 3D sonography and known flow rates showed that the method has good accuracy. Subsequent comparisons under pulsatile and in vivo conditions will be needed to verify this performance for clinical applications.