Premium
FAST (Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma) Accurate for Cardiac and Intraperitoneal Injury in Penetrating Anterior Chest Trauma
Author(s) -
Tayal Vivek S.,
Beatty Michael A.,
Marx John A.,
Tomaszewski Christian A.,
Thomason Michael H.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2004.23.4.467
Subject(s) - medicine , focused assessment with sonography for trauma , pericardial effusion , thoracotomy , trauma center , laparotomy , penetrating trauma , confidence interval , radiology , surgery , effusion , prospective cohort study , pericardial window , injury severity score , emergency department , poison control , retrospective cohort study , abdominal trauma , emergency medicine , injury prevention , blunt , psychiatry
Objective. To evaluate the FAST (focused assessment with sonography in trauma) examination for determining traumatic pericardial effusion and intraperitoneal fluid indicative of injury in patients with penetrating anterior chest trauma. Methods. An observational prospective study was conducted over a 30‐month period at an urban level I trauma center. FAST was performed in the emergency department by emergency physicians and trauma surgeons. FAST results were recorded before review of patient outcome as determined by 1 or more of the following: thoracotomy, laparotomy, pericardial window, cardiologic echocardiography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomography, and serial examinations. Results. FAST was undertaken in 32 patients with penetrating anterior chest trauma: 20 (65%) had stab wounds, and 12 (35%) had gunshot wounds. Sensitivity of FAST for cardiac injury (n = 8) in patients with pericardial effusion was 100% (95% confidence interval, 63.1%–100%); specificity was 100% (95% confidence interval, 85.8%–100%). The presence of pericardial effusion determined by FAST correlated with the need for thoracotomy in 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients (95% confidence interval, 47.3%–99.7%). One patient with a pericardial blood clot on cardiologic echocardiography was treated nonsurgically. FAST had 100% sensitivity for intraperitoneal injury (95% confidence interval, 63.1%–100%) in 8 patients with views indicating intraperitoneal fluid but without pericardial effusion, again with no false‐positive results, giving a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 85.8%–100%). This prompted necessary laparotomy in all 8. Conclusions. In this series of patients with penetrating anterior chest trauma, the FAST examination was sensitive and specific in the determination of both traumatic pericardial effusion and intraperitoneal fluid indicative of injury, thus effectively guiding emergent surgical decision making.