Premium
Use of quantitative ultrasonography in differentiating osteomalacia from osteoporosis: preliminary study.
Author(s) -
Luisetto G,
Camozzi V,
De Terlizzi F
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2000.19.4.251
Subject(s) - medicine , osteomalacia , osteoporosis , ultrasound , nuclear medicine , radiology
The aim of this work was to use ultrasonographic technology to differentiate osteoporosis from osteomalacia on the basis of different patterns of the graphic trace. Three patients with osteomalacia and three with osteoporosis, all with the same lumbar spine bone mineral density, were studied. The velocity of the ultrasound beam in bone was measured by a DBM Sonic 1,200/I densitometer at the proximal phalanges of the hands in all the patients. The ultrasound beam velocity was measured when the first peak of the waveform reached a predetermined minimum amplitude value (amplitude‐dependent speed of sound) as well as at the lowest point prior to the first and second peaks, before they reached the predetermined minimum amplitude value (first and second minimum speeds of sound). The graphic traces were further analyzed by Fourier analysis, and both the main frequency (f0) and the width of the peak centered in the f0 (full width at half maximum) were measured. The first and second minimum speeds of sound were significantly lower in the patients with osteomalacia than in the osteoporosis group. The first minimum speed of sound was 2,169 +/‐ 73 m/s in osteoporosis and 1,983 +/‐ 61 m/s in osteomalacia (P < 0.0001); the second minimum peak speed of sound was 1,895 +/‐59 m/s in osteoporosis and 1,748 +/‐ 38 m/s in osteomalacia (P < 0.0001). The f0 was similar in the two groups (osteoporosis, 0.85 +/‐ 0.14 MHz; osteomalacia, 0.9 +/‐ 0.22 MHz; P = 0.72), and the full width at half maximum was significantly higher in the osteomalacia patients (0.52 +/‐ 0.14 MHz) than in the osteoporosis patients (0.37 +/‐ 0.15 MHz) (P = 0.022). This study confirms that ultrasonography is a promising, noninvasive method that could be used to differentiate osteoporosis from osteomalacia, but further studies should be carried out before this method can be introduced into clinical practice.