z-logo
Premium
Section 7‐‐discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.143
Subject(s) - mechanical index , index (typography) , medicine , section (typography) , citation , ultrasound , medical physics , nuclear medicine , library science , computer science , radiology , microbubbles , world wide web , operating system
There have been long‐term efforts to identify a threshold pressure for the onset of inertial cavitation under conditions relevant to ultrasound in medicine. Before the introduction of the output display standard [AIUM/NEMA, 1992a], quantities such as the spatial peak pulse average intensity (I(SPPA)), and, earlier, Im, the spatial peak intensity averaged over the largest half‐cycle, were used to give a measure of the potential of a cavitation‐based bioeffect due to an acoustic field. Relatively early in the Output Display Standard development effort, the Food and Drug Administration indicated a need for a superior indicator for the potential for cavitation‐related bioeffects, initiating a search for such an index. The following paragraphs give an outline of the steps used to develop the Mechanical Index, its relevance as a potential bioeffects indicator, and some information on other exposure parameters involved in bioeffects research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here