Premium
Comparison of biparietal diameter and femur length in the third trimester: effects of gestational age and variation in fetal growth.
Author(s) -
Wolfson R N,
Peisner D B,
Chik L L,
Sokol R J
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.1986.5.3.145
Subject(s) - biparietal diameter , medicine , gestational age , femur , fetus , gestation , obstetrics , pregnancy , percentile , fetal growth , surgery , mathematics , statistics , biology , genetics , head circumference
A multiple regression‐based statistical model capable of quantitatively comparing two or more sonographic parameters for the effects of gestational age, variation in fetal growth and error in sonographic measurement is presented and then used to compare the biparietal diameter and femur length as estimators of gestational age in late pregnancy. A total of 311 patients were studied between 24 and 42 weeks' gestation. Variation in fetal growth was expressed as the birth weight percentile for gestational age. Biparietal diameter and femur length correlated equally well with gestational age. However, the biparietal diameter was more than twice as sensitive as the femur length to variation in fetal growth. Femur length had a larger error associated with its measurement. These results suggest that the biparietal diameter and femur length in late pregnancy are equal estimators of gestational age; that the femur length is a more stable estimator of gestational age when fetal growth deviates from normal; and that the femur length is technically more difficult to obtain.