Premium
Intrapartum fetal weight estimation: a comparison of three formulae.
Author(s) -
Yarkoni S,
Reece E A,
Wan M,
Holford T,
Romero R,
Hobbins J C
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of ultrasound in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.574
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1550-9613
pISSN - 0278-4297
DOI - 10.7863/jum.1986.5.12.707
Subject(s) - medicine , fetal weight , biparietal diameter , fetus , birth weight , ultrasound , nuclear medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , head circumference , radiology , genetics , biology
To determine the relative accuracy of fetal weight estimation using the biparietal diameter (BPD), the abdominal circumference (AC), and the femur length (FL) in three formulae (BPD/AC, FL/AC, and BPD/AC/FL), 63 patients in labor were examined. All patients delivered within 24 hours of ultrasound examination. A good correlation was found between the estimated fetal weight and the actual birth weight, using the three formulae: BPD/AC (r = 0.96); FL/AC (r = 0.95); and BPD/AC/FL (r = 0.96). The FL/AC formula overestimated fetal weight (P less than 0.01), however, particularly in fetuses weighing more than 2000 g. The mean percentage error with the BPD/AC formula was 0.99 per cent, 3.82 per cent with the FL/AC, and 2.43 per cent with the BPD/AC/FL formula. This study showed that although all three formulae were comparable, the best estimation of the birth weight was obtained when either the BPD/AC or the BPD/AC/FL formulae were used. Additionally, the results demonstrate that reliable estimates of fetal weight can be made even at term or in laboring patients.