Open AccessStudy of Urinary Glycosaminoglycans among Essential Hypertensive Patients
Author(s) -
IC Devaraj,
Dhiraj J. Trivedi,
Vijay S. Patil,
V Indumati,
NB Sanjeevini
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of clinical and diagnostic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2249-782X
pISSN - 0973-709X
DOI - 10.7860/jcdr/2021/51777.15695
Subject(s) - medicine , urine , creatinine , urinary system , essential hypertension , renal function , glycosaminoglycan , urology , confidence interval , excretion , outpatient clinic , endocrinology , physiology , gastroenterology , blood pressure , anatomy
Essential hypertension is a systemic disease which affects endothelial basement membrane. Changes in Glycosaminoglycans (GAG) distribution pattern on glomerular basement membrane has been noted in hypertension. Hence it seems likely that an increase excretion of GAG levels may be an indicator of reduction in renal function. The qualitative or quantitative determination of urinary GAGs may be of value and could constitute a non invasive marker to assess the renal damage in essential hypertension. Aim: Differential analysis of urinary GAGs in essential hypertensive patients. Materials and Methods: This analytical case-control observational study which was conducted from November 2014 to June 2016 in Department of Biochemistry, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India. The study group included 50 male patients with age group of 30-60 years, clinically diagnosed with essential hypertension. Control group included 50 healthy male individuals with age group of 30-60 years, blood donors visiting to hospital blood bank. Random urine sample was collected. Urine creatinine was estimated by Jaffe’s method, urine GAGs by Dimethyl methylene blue (DMMB) dye method and urine microalbumin by particle enhanced Turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay method. Correlation was tested with Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Level of significance was set for p-value <0.05 with confidence interval of 95%. Results: In present study, urinary GAGs levels in essential hypertensive study group was 14.57±10.16 mg/dL and in control group was 10.09±6.04 mg/dL. Urinary GAGs levels in essential hypertensive group was significantly high (p-value=0.890) when compared with normotensive control group. But no statistical significant correlation was found between urine GAGs and urine microalbumin in hypertensive study group. Conclusion: Estimation of urine glycosaminoglycans in essential hypertensive patients is a simple, rapid and cost effective test which asseses the glomerular function. It can be used as one of the early marker for diagnosis of nephropathy before microalbuminuria sets in.