Open AccessA Bibliyography Trial On Intertextuality In Classical Turkish Literature And A Case Study Of “Fuzûlî-Hâfız” By Hasibe Mazıoğlu
Author(s) -
Nagehan Uçan Eke
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
turkish studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1308-2140
DOI - 10.7827/turkishstudies.4368
Subject(s) - intertextuality , turkish , literature , linguistics , art , philosophy
The development of the civilizations is impossible if they do notmeet richer cultures and civilizations and do not benefit from them. Theolder and great civilizations like Sumerian, Egyptian, Greek, Latin andIslam civilizations survive their presence by receiving something fromthe previous civilizations and giving something to latter civilizations. Alot of famous writer benefit from the language and culture they met andenrich their philosophy. Writer who uses works of different languagesand different cultures has the opportunity of the comparison of differentcultures. A way to compare it to “the other person to come and discoverhim to face with” means. Each literary work or text, although ownoriginality, there are other artifacts are a reflection on them and getsthe location within the network, enters into the relationships ofharmony and affinity. Comparison of two different literature or culturewas regarded as the concept of “comparative literature”, in later yearsas an interdisciplinary field of literature-sociology, literaturepsychology,literature-philosophy, literature and other arts-painting,music, photos, relationships, especially in recent years, is regarded asan extension of literature with close ties to the movie and compare it tothese different areas are technical, such as aspects of style. Butconsidiring the context in which information, comparative literature,different cultures and different literatures are treated as an unfoldingand vanishing expansion. In this study, first “intertextuality” and“comparative literature” concepts are briefly described than a generalBibliography on Classical Turkish Literature and Intertextuality of workuntil today are presented and finally “Fuzûlî-Hâfız: A comparison of twopoet” is presented from Hasibe Mazıoğlu, which is one of the first andmost notable work in this area.