Open AccessMeasuring Open Access Policy Compliance: Results of a Survey
Author(s) -
Shan Kipphut-Smith,
Michael Boock,
Kimberly Chapman,
Michaela Willi Hooper
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of librarianship and scholarly communication
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2162-3309
DOI - 10.7710/2162-3309.2247
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , terminology , compliance (psychology) , public relations , qualitative property , institution , workflow , business , political science , computer science , psychology , computer security , database , social psychology , philosophy , linguistics , machine learning , law
In the last decade, a significant number of institutions have adopted open access (OA) policies. Many of those working with OA policies are tasked with measuring policy compliance. This article reports on a survey of Coalition of Open Access Policy Institutions (COAPI) members designed to better understand the methods currently used for measuring and communicating OA policy success. METHODS This electronic survey was distributed to the COAPI member listserv, inviting both institutions who have passed an implemented policies and those who are still developing policies to participate. RESULTS The results to a number of questions related to topics such as policy workflows, quantitative and qualitative measurement activities and related tools, and challenges showed a wide range of responses, which are shared here. DISCUSSION It is clear that a number of COAPI members struggle with identifying what should be measured and what tools and methods are appropriate. The survey illustrates how each institution measures compliance differently, making it difficult to benchmark against peer institutions. CONCLUSION As a result of this survey, we recommend that institutions working with OA policies be as transparent as possible about their data sources and methods when calculating deposit rates and other quantitative measures. It is hoped that this transparency will result in the development of a set of qualitative and quantitative best practices for assessing OA policies that standardizes assessment terminology and articulates why institutions may want to measure policies.