z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Superlexical versus lexical prefixes
Author(s) -
Eugenia Romanova
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
nordlyd
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1503-8599
pISSN - 0332-7531
DOI - 10.7557/12.69
Subject(s) - prefix , linguistics , verb , lexical definition , resultative , meaning (existential) , computer science , argument (complex analysis) , lexical item , mathematics , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , psychology , philosophy , biology , biochemistry , psychotherapist
This paper is intended to justify the classification of all the Rus- sian prefixes into lexical and superlexical. It gives semantic and syntactic criteria for distinguishing between the two groups, includ-\uding: the idiosyncratic or spatial lexical meaning versus operator-like function; the (in)ability to measure over objects and events; the (in)ability to stack; the (in)ability of a host verb to form secondary imperfective; attaching to (a)telic stems; the (in)ability to change the argument structure of a host verb. Applying these criteria results in finer gradation within the group of superlexical prefixes. It is ac- counted for by their different syntactic positions with respect to vP. At the end of the paper I speculate about the effect this architecture can have on the prefixation of unaccusative and unergative verbs

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here