z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Multiscale evaluation of a thin-bed reservoir
Author(s) -
Anita Lis-Śledziona
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
geology, geophysics and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2353-0790
pISSN - 2299-8004
DOI - 10.7494/geol.2021.47.1.5
Subject(s) - petrophysics , geology , saturation (graph theory) , well logging , porosity , mineralogy , water saturation , facies , electrical resistivity and conductivity , soil science , geotechnical engineering , geomorphology , petroleum engineering , mathematics , engineering , combinatorics , structural basin , electrical engineering
A thin-bed laminated shaly-sand reservoir of the Miocene formation was evaluated using two methods: high resolution microresistivity data from the XRMI tool and conventional well logs. Based on high resolution data, the Earth model of the reservoir was defined in a way that allowed the analyzed interval to be subdivided into thin layers of sandstones, mudstones, and claystones. Theoretical logs of gamma ray, bulk density, horizontal and vertical resistivity were calculated based on the forward modeling method to describe the petrophysical properties of individual beds and calculate the clay volume, porosity, and water saturation. The relationships amongst the contents of minerals were established based on the XRD data from the neighboring wells; hence, the high-resolution lithological model was evaluated. Predicted curves and estimated volumes of minerals were used as an input in multimineral solver and based on the assumed petrophysical model the input data were recalculated, reconstructed and compared with the predicted curves. The volumes of minerals and input curves were adjusted during several runs to minimalize the error between predicted and recalculated variables. Another approach was based on electrofacies modeling using unsupervised self-organizing maps. As an input, conventional well logs were used. Then, the evaluated facies model was used during forward modeling of the effective porosity, horizontal resistivity and water saturation. The obtained results were compared and, finally, the effective thickness of the reservoir was established based on the results from the two methods.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here