Open AccessTransnational Relations and Activism in International Relations: Debates and Consensus in Literature
Author(s) -
Ani Widyani Soetjipto,
Arivia Tri Dara Yuliestiana
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
global : jurnal politik internasional/global
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2579-8251
pISSN - 1411-5492
DOI - 10.7454/global.v22i1.479
Subject(s) - international relations , transnationalism , globalization , constructivism (international relations) , sociology , civil society , post realism , international relations theory , politics , political science , internationalism (politics) , gender studies , social science , political economy , law
This article explores the concepts of transnational relations and activism in the study of International Relations, specifically the role of civil society in transnational advocacy. It is fascinating to discuss the role of civil society when state actors are no longer the most prominent actors in International Relations studies in the midst of globalisation. Some articles related to transnational relations have been written by the scholars of International Relations such as Thomas Risse-Kappen (1995). Even so, one of the most sophisticated concepts of transnational activism was introduced by Margaret Keck and Kathryn Sikkink (1998), in Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. In order to fully understand transnational activism in the study of International Relations, a divergent perspective can be applied. In this article, the authors aim to examine the recent debates and its counternarratives in International Relations through critical and constructivism lenses. Firstly, this article would describe the concepts of transnationalism and transnational activism in the study of International Relations (state of the art). Secondly, it would be a discussion in the literature on transnationalism and transnational activism which cover themes about norm diffusion, the ‘boomerang pattern’, political opportunity structures and accountability and effectiveness. The last part is conclusion that can be drawn from this consensus and debates in the concept of transnational activism.