z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cost‐efficacy analysis of darunavir/r monotherapy in clinical practice
Author(s) -
Pérez Elías M,
MartinezColubi M,
Sanz J,
Gomez C,
Sepulveda M,
Estrada V,
Moreno A,
Muriel A,
Dronda F,
Del Palacio M,
Casado J,
GómezAyerbe C,
Rodriguez Sagrado M,
Moreno S
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of the international aids society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.724
H-Index - 62
ISSN - 1758-2652
DOI - 10.7448/ias.15.6.18373
Subject(s) - medicine , darunavir , adverse effect , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiretroviral therapy , viral load , virology
Purpose of the study To evaluate the economic impact of a swiching strategy to DRV/r mx in clinical practice using Spanish prices. Methods Multicenter retrospective study of four tertiary hospitals in Spain. The analysis includes 147 patients switching to DRV/r mx mainly due to toxicity or simplification from March 2009 to June 2011. The Spanish costs (ex‐factory price+VAT) per patient with HIV RNA<50 copies/ml were calculated, accounting for additional/ switch antiretroviral taken after initial treatment failure and management of adverse events. Cost of adverse events were based on a Spanish publication [1] (updated by the inflation rate until april 2012) The horizon of the analysis was of 48 weeks. Summary of results Baseline characteristics were: women (30.6%), median age (49 yr), IDU (45%), AIDS stage (32%), HCV coinfected (48%, 40% with advanced fibrosis), length of HIV‐RNA<1.7 before DRV/rtv mtx 67.6. Most frequent reasons for switching to DRVr mx were toxicity (62.6%) and simplification (23.8%). If a hospital with 600 patients in ART treatment, switched from 10% to 20% of its patients to DRV/r mx, there is a potential to save up to 448,000€/year. Conclusions Switching to DRV/r mx is a cost‐effective strategy that allows more patients to be treated for a fixed budget. Higher cost saving is expected when toxicity is the reason for switching.Baseline HAART DRV/r Monotherapy DifferenceMean cost per patient (ARV) 8.471€ 5.773€ ‐ 2.698€ Mean cost per patient (AEs) 70€ 5€ ‐ 65€Total Mean cost per patient* 8.541€ 5.778€ ‐ 2.762€Number treated for 1,000,000 117 173 56% HIV RNA<50 copies/ml (OTT) 93,10% 93,10% 0,00%Cost per success 9.174€ 6.207€ ‐ 2.967€Number of success 109 161 52ICER (Incremental Cost Efficacy Ratio)Dominated* Includes ARV and AEs treatment costs.48 Weeks Cost‐Efficacy analysis: Simplification strategy to DRV/r monotherapy% of patients that Switches to DRV/r monotherapy10% 15% 20%Number of patients in ARV treatment 600 600 600Number of patients in DRV/r Monotherapy 60 90 120Before Switch: 1 year cost 512.441€ 768.662€ 1.024.883€After Switch: 1 year cost 346.698€ 520.048€ 693.397€Total Cost Saving 165.743€ 248.614€ 331.486€Hospital Budget Impact Analysis: assuming that 10%–20% of 600 patients in ARV treatment simplifies to DRV/r monotherapy

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom