z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Complex Geodetic and Photogrammetric Monitoring of the Kral’ovany Rock Slide
Author(s) -
Scott Sokol,
Marek Bajtala,
M. Lipták,
Peter Brunčák
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of sustainable mining
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.623
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2543-4950
pISSN - 2300-3960
DOI - 10.7424/jsm140405
Subject(s) - geodetic datum , interpolation (computer graphics) , surface (topology) , photogrammetry , elevation (ballistics) , digital elevation model , volume (thermodynamics) , geology , laser scanning , remote sensing , geodesy , geometry , mathematics , computer science , laser , optics , physics , computer graphics (images) , animation , quantum mechanics
ABSTRACTPurposeThe aim of this paper is to assess the impact of input data density and diversity on surfaces obtained using the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) method for creating digital elevation model (DEM). For this we can use several approaches, while we have chosen an intermediary parameter – volume calculation, which is in practice the most frequently requested requirement from surveyors.MethodsPrecise terrestrial measurement and terrestrial laser scanning were used to ensure that detailed knowledge about the surface and volumes of two piles of earth and a stone pit in comparison with theoretical defined surfaces was obtained.ResultsMathematically defined surfaces generally have smooth shapes, and thus the effect of different density on the input data is less apparent in the final comparison of volumes. In our case the results for most of the different interpolation methods and the different density of the input data was less than 0.5%. From the experimental measurements of the two earth bodies and the quarry, which have an irregular shape with unsmooth surfaces, we can only test the relative precision of the calculated volumes to the data with the highest density.Experimental measurements in the area of the quarry, where the scanned surface was uneven and considerably different in height, confirmed the assumption that a vastly irregular surface should exhibit more significant variations than a smooth surface, but for the nearest neighbour method relative errors under 1% were achieved.Practical implicationsAccording to the results from the analysis above, the lower density of input data we have, the lower the precision of calculating volumes we can assume, but it is interesting that we did not achieved significantly worse results with strongly irregular surfaces compared to a less irregular surface.Originality/valueThe input values for the analysis of theoretically defined surfaces were obtained by the calculation of integral calculus and earth-moving bodies and quarry from an experimental measurement terrestrial laser scanning method and were used in Slovakia for the first time

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here