z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dissociating proactively and retroactively cued task switching: a route towards neuropsychological analyses of cognitive control
Author(s) -
Bruno Kopp,
K. Wessel
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
neuropsychological trends
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.198
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 1970-321X
pISSN - 1970-3201
DOI - 10.7358/neur-2011-010-kopp
Subject(s) - task switching , cued speech , task (project management) , cognitive psychology , psychology , cognition , dissociation (chemistry) , transition (genetics) , control (management) , perseveration , neuropsychology , computer science , neuroscience , artificial intelligence , biochemistry , chemistry , management , economics , gene
Cognitive control is often examined in task switching paradigms with dissociable types of task switching. Proactive task-cuing presents switch cues, signaling both a change of task and the task to implement, which occur prior to imperative events. Proactive transition-cuing utilizes switch cues, signaling a change of task but not indicating the required task, which occur prior to imperative events. Retroactive transition-cuing utilizes switch cues, again signaling a change of task but not indicating the required task, which occur later than imperative events. Thirty-six healthy young adults participated in the study. Response time switch costs were most pronounced on proactive task-cuing, whereas perseveration errors showed highest prevalence on retroactive transition-cuing. Principal component analyses revealed evidence for two components corresponding to the distinction between proactive and retroactive task-cuing, thus implying a dissociation between proactively and retroactively cued task switching. Retroactive transitioncuing might be particularly sensitive to frontal lesions of the cortex.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here