z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Suing online platforms for copyright infringements: the choice of court and law in the “Project Gutenberg” scenario
Author(s) -
Maiia Otchenash
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
revista de internet, derecho y política
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.153
H-Index - 2
ISSN - 1699-8154
DOI - 10.7238/idp.v0i29.3175
Subject(s) - jurisdiction , choice of law , appeal , law , liability , enforcement , copyright law , fair use , common law , political science , copyright infringement , civil procedure , business , intellectual property
This paper examines the current challenges in copyright enforcement online in a case from Germany, concerning the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.Project Gutenberg was found liable for a breach of German copyright law and access to certain items was blocked by Germany. Gutenberg believes that the German court has no jurisdiction over the matter, but will comply until the issue is resolved on appeal.The paper illustrates possible alternatives for jurisdiction and applicable law in the EU. Current choice-of-court and choice-of-law rules are argued to be unsuitable for copyright claims for the online environment. Further, the paper focuses on the latest case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) concerning the liability of intermediaries and the safe harbour regime. “Hosting” safe harbour is supposed to be rejected when a platform is directly liable for copyright infringement jointly with its users.Furthermore, the paper will describe how the same conclusions would also apply to the Google Books Library Project. Both cases illustrate the current problems of territorial copyright laws in the online environment.The challenges in enforcing copyright online encourage copyright holders to seek protection within just one jurisdiction so that one single law can be applied. This weighs heavily when deciding upon a litigation strategy for copyright claims. The lessons learnt in this field show how cross-border enforcement of copyright online is tremendously unpredictable for defendants and unaffordable for copyright holders, and thus, benefits nobody.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here