
Middleway aesthetics: an aesthetical way to say nothing about aesthetics
Author(s) -
Janyne Sattler
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
revista de filosofia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.1
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 1980-5934
pISSN - 0104-4443
DOI - 10.7213/aurora.27.040.ao06
Subject(s) - sketch , circumstantial evidence , nothing , aesthetics , appeal , persuasion , philosophy , everyday aesthetics , epistemology , history , computer science , law , linguistics , archaeology , algorithm , political science
This is a very brief sketch on Wittgenstein’s “middle” writings about aesthetical appreciation and aesthetical attitude concerning the objects of art. Even if it takes the Tractarian conception of ‘aesthetics’ as a starting point, the paper is focused on Wittgenstein’s (second-hand) class-notes taken from his Lectures on Aesthetics and a very specific remark reported by Moore, brought from the Philosophical Occasions, where “reasons” for aesthetical persuasion and correction are said to be like those offered in “discussions in a court of law”. At the end, not much is left for aesthetical appreciation and for aestheticsitself but a certain kind of contextual, circumstantial “appeal to the judge”.