z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Arguing for Convincing: Rhetoric of the Scientific Discourse
Author(s) -
Tomás Albaladejo
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
mètode. annual review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.129
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 2174-9221
pISSN - 2174-3487
DOI - 10.7203/metode.6.4615
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , rhetorical question , rhetoric , civil discourse , epistemology , discourse analysis , scientific writing , sociology , linguistics , philosophy
This paper deals with scientific discourse as a rhetorical discourse from the point of view of the structure of the classical parts of oral discourse (and all kinds of discourse). The role of argumentation in discourse, with the perlocutionary goal of convincing the receiver, is studied as the foundation of the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. A scientific treatise by Santiago Ramón y Cajal is analysed using the tools provided by rhetoric in order to prove the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the crucial role of argumentation in scientific discourse and to demonstrate its permeation of the entire discours

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here