Open AccessDifferences in Endoscopic Findings of Primary and Secondary Gastric Lymphoma
Author(s) -
Kyoungwon Jung,
Hae Soo Jeon,
Moo In Park,
Il Hyeong Choe,
Hyun Seung Je,
Kim Jae Hyun,
Kim Sung Eun,
Won Moon,
Park Seun Ja
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
gosin daehakgyo uigwa daehak haksulji/kosin medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2586-7024
pISSN - 2005-9531
DOI - 10.7180/kmj.2020.35.2.114
Subject(s) - medicine , lymphoma , gastric lymphoma , gastroenterology , stomach , retrospective cohort study , endoscopy , fundus (uterus) , adenocarcinoma , medical record , lesion , lymph node , radiology , pathology , cancer
Objectives : Since endoscopic findings of primary gastric lymphoma are ambiguous and diverse, it is not easy to distinguish them from gastric adenocarcinoma or secondary gastric lymphoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in clinical and endoscopic features between primary gastric lymphoma and gastric involvement of lymphoma. Methods : Forty-eight patients were enrolled in this retrospective study between June 2008 and February 2017. The patients were divided into primary gastric lymphoma group (primary group, n = 18) and gastric involvement group (secondary group, n = 30) based on whether or not they carried gastric lesions alone. Patients’ clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings and pathologic data were retrospectively reviewed based on electronic medical records. Results : The mean age of patients was 63.3 ± 13.1 years and 29 patients were female (60.4%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma pathology (81.3%), gastric body involvement (47.9%) and ulceroinfiltrative morphology on endoscopy (43.8%) were common features. Regardless of the two groups, the initial endoscopic diagnosis was considered as lymphoma only in 41.7%. Compared with the primary group, fundus ( P = 0.035) and regional lymph node ( P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the secondary group. However, there was no significant difference in endoscopic findings including location, size, number, and morphology of lesion. Conclusions : Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric lymphoma is a challenge. There is no difference in endoscopic findings between the primary and secondary groups even when confirmed separately. However, when the lesion is present in the fundus, we keep in mind the possibility of secondary gastric lymphoma.