Open AccessAT HØRE, AT HØRE EFTER, AT HØRE TIL: Strategier i forbindelse med høretab og høreapparater
Author(s) -
Susanne Bisgaard
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
antropologi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2596-5425
pISSN - 0906-3021
DOI - 10.7146/ta.v0i54.106747
Subject(s) - wish , lifeworld , hearing loss , hearing aid , natural (archaeology) , psychology , subject (documents) , meaning (existential) , social psychology , aesthetics , audiology , sociology , medicine , history , art , computer science , psychotherapist , social science , archaeology , library science , anthropology
As long as the sense of hearing remains intact, the individual can participate in the
negotiation and production of social and cultural values in the contexts to which she or
he ascribes a meaning. But what happens when the sounds are muffled? The handling of
hearing loss is subject to substantial individual differences – some wish to participate in
all social contexts, others wish only to uphold contact to specific segments of the lifeworld.
The hard of hearing may be excluded from a number of contexts, but the hearing aid may
be a help to retain a position. Some use them in all their waking hours, others only in
specific contexts. The difference is due to physiological and technological circumstances,
because no two hearing losses are perceived in the same way. Moreover, the technology
of the hearing aid may help the user to hear better, but it does not restore natural hearing.
Typically, the hard of hearing go through a process, in which the physical hearing loss
is related to the lifeworld. In this process the individual moves from being a normal
hearing person to being hard of hearing. Being hard of hearing differed for the informants
from a wish to participate in social life to an utter loss of one’s functioning and a concern
with bodily appearance.