
Challenging the Sovereign: Three Types of Early Modern Federal Theory
Author(s) -
Jan Smoleński
Publication year - 2016
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2446-0893
DOI - 10.7146/politik.v19i3.27414
Subject(s) - sovereignty , federalism , political science , geopolitics , normative , politics , state (computer science) , law and economics , popular sovereignty , law , political economy , economic system , public administration , sociology , economics , computer science , algorithm
In this paper, I develop three ideal types of early modern federal theories: sovereignty relativizing federalism, sovereignty pooling federalism, and bottom-up federalism. Each of these types respond to a different political effect of the development of the modern state: organ sovereignty, hostile geopolitical environment, and disempowerment of the society as a corollary to organ sovereignty, respectively. Each of these types conceives of the federation as an alternative to the state. I compare and contrast these types along the lines of implementation of the federal principle of self- and shared rule, the criteria of evaluation of federal arrangements, and the normative implications.