z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Challenging the Sovereign: Three Types of Early Modern Federal Theory
Author(s) -
Jan Smoleński
Publication year - 2016
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2446-0893
DOI - 10.7146/politik.v19i3.27414
Subject(s) - sovereignty , federalism , political science , geopolitics , normative , politics , state (computer science) , law and economics , popular sovereignty , law , political economy , economic system , public administration , sociology , economics , computer science , algorithm
In this paper, I develop three ideal types of early modern federal theories: sovereignty relativizing federalism, sovereignty pooling federalism, and bottom-up federalism. Each of these types respond to a different political effect of the development of the modern state: organ sovereignty, hostile geopolitical environment, and disempowerment of the society as a corollary to organ sovereignty, respectively. Each of these types conceives of the federation as an alternative to the state. I compare and contrast these types along the lines of implementation of the federal principle of self- and shared rule, the criteria of evaluation of federal arrangements, and the normative implications.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here