z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Service professionals’ classification of core and complementary tasks
Author(s) -
Mette Kjærgaard Thomsen,
Ulrik Thy Jensen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
politica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2246-042X
pISSN - 0105-0710
DOI - 10.7146/politica.v50i3.131191
Subject(s) - core (optical fiber) , set (abstract data type) , health professionals , service (business) , public relations , psychology , public service , nursing , business , political science , medicine , health care , computer science , marketing , telecommunications , law , programming language
Non-professional actors such as volunteers, service users, and citizens increasingly contribute to the production of public services. While increased involvement of such non-professionals is expected to have positive effects on the capacity of public organizations, few studies have explored professionals’ attitudes towards this trend. A central question concerns what services professionals see as core tasks that ought to be performed by professionals. We introduce a theoretical distinction between core and complimentary tasks and use a survey to investigate how health assistants employed at nursing homes classify various tasks along these two categories. Finally, we examine whether health assistants with a short and long education classify the same set of tasks differently, thereby shedding light on the importance of the degree of professionalism for the classification of concrete tasks as either core or complimentary.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here