Open AccessComprehensible legal texts - utopia or a question of wording? On processing rephrased German court decisions
Author(s) -
Sandra Hansen,
Ralph Dirksen,
Martin Küchler,
Kerstin Kunz,
Stella Neumann
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
hermes
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.759
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 1903-1785
pISSN - 0904-1699
DOI - 10.7146/hjlcb.v19i36.25836
Subject(s) - german , newspaper , reading (process) , linguistics , computer science , utopia , natural language processing , artificial intelligence , sociology , history , philosophy , art history , media studies
This paper presents a study on the comprehensibility of rephrased syntactic structures in German court decisions. While there are a number of studies using psycholinguistic methods to investigate the comprehensibility of original legal texts, we are not aware of any study looking into the effect resolving complex structures has on the comprehensibility. Our study combines three methodological steps. First, we analyse an annotated corpus of court decisions, press releases and newspaper reports on these decisions in order to detect those complex structures in the decisions which distinguish them from the other text types. Secondly, these structures are rephrased into two increasingly simple versions. Finally, all versions are subjected to a self paced reading experiment. The ndings suggest that rephrasing greatly enhances the comprehensibility for the lay reader.