
Thunks and the lambda-Calculus (Extended Version)
Author(s) -
John Hatcliff,
Olivier Danvy
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
brics report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1601-5355
pISSN - 0909-0878
DOI - 10.7146/brics.v4i7.18797
Subject(s) - correctness , continuation , operational semantics , mathematics , semantics (computer science) , lambda calculus , programming language , type (biology) , arithmetic , extension (predicate logic) , calculus (dental) , algebra over a field , discrete mathematics , computer science , algorithm , pure mathematics , medicine , dentistry , ecology , biology
Plotkin, in his seminal article Call-by-name, call-by-value and the lambda-calculus, formalized evaluation strategies and simulations using operational semantics and continuations. In particular, he showed how call-by-name evaluation could be simulated under call-by-value evaluation and vice versa. Since Algol 60, however, call-by-name is both implemented and simulated with thunks rather than with continuations. We recast this folk theorem in Plotkin's setting, and show that thunks, even though they are simpler than continuations, are sufficient for establishing all the correctness properties of Plotkin's call-by-name simulation. Furthermore, we establish a new relationship between Plotkin's two continuation-based simulations Cn and Cv, by deriving Cn as the composition of our thunk-based simulation T and of Cv^+ - an extension of Cv handling thunks. Almost all of the correctness properties of Cn follow from the properties of T and Cv^+ . This simplifies reasoning about call-by-name continuation-passing style. We also give several applications involving factoring continuation-based transformations using thunks.