z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Linear Zero-Knowledgde. A Note on Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Arguments
Author(s) -
Ivan Damgård,
Ronald Cramer
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
brics report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1601-5355
pISSN - 0909-0878
DOI - 10.7146/brics.v3i7.19970
Subject(s) - zero knowledge proof , security parameter , mathematics , mathematical proof , discrete mathematics , communication complexity , gas meter prover , zero (linguistics) , discrete logarithm , arithmetic , combinatorics , cryptography , computer science , algorithm , public key cryptography , encryption , linguistics , philosophy , geometry , operating system
We present a zero-knowledge proof system [19] for any NP language L, which allows showing that x in L with error probability less than 2^−k using communication corresponding to O(|x|^c) + k bit commitments, where c is a constant depending only on L. The proof can be based on any bit commitment scheme with a particular set of properties. We suggest an efficient implementation based on factoring. We also present a 4-move perfect zero-knowledge interactive argument for any NP-language L. On input x in L, the communication complexity is O(|x|^c) max(k; l) bits, where l is the security parameter for the prover. Again, the protocol can be based on any bit commitment scheme with a particular set of properties. We suggest efficient implementations based on discrete logarithms or factoring. We present an application of our techniques to multiparty computations, allowing for example t committed oblivious transfers with error probability 2^−k to be done simultaneously using O(t+k) commitments. Results for general computations follow from this. As a function of the security parameters, our protocols have the smallest known asymptotic communication complexity among general proofs or arguments for NP. Moreover, the constants involved are small enough for the protocols to be practical in a realistic situation: both protocols are based on a Boolean formula Phi containing and- , or- and not-operators which verifies an NP-witness of membership in L. Let n be the number of times this formula reads an input variable. Then the communication complexity of the protocols when using our concrete commitment schemes can be more precisely stated as at most 4n + k + 1 commitments for the interactive proof and at most 5nl +5l bits for the argument (assuming k the number of commitments required for the proof is linear in n. Both protocols are also proofs of knowledge of an NP-witness of membership in the language involved.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here