z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Count(q) does not imply Count(p)
Author(s) -
Søren Riis
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
brics report series
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1601-5355
pISSN - 0909-0878
DOI - 10.7146/brics.v1i21.21646
Subject(s) - mathematics , count data , prime (order theory) , conjecture , combinatorics , gate count , arithmetic , discrete mathematics , statistics , computer science , poisson distribution , embedded system
I solve a conjecture originally studied by M.Ajtai. It states that for different primes q, p the matching principles Count(q) and Count(p) are logically independent. I prove that this indeed is the case. Actually I show that Count(q) implies Count(p) exactly when each prime in p also is a factor in q.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom