Open AccessThe Validity and Reliability of Student Evaluation of Teaching at the National University of Lesotho
Author(s) -
Regina M. Thetsane
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of african higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2313-5069
DOI - 10.6017/ijahe.v8i1.13367
Subject(s) - formative assessment , summative assessment , scale (ratio) , psychology , bachelor , set (abstract data type) , validity , reliability (semiconductor) , mathematics education , quality (philosophy) , construct validity , discriminant validity , medical education , applied psychology , computer science , psychometrics , medicine , clinical psychology , political science , power (physics) , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , internal consistency , programming language , law
Many Higher Education Institutions use the Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) scale to evaluate the quality of instructors’ teaching. It includes students’ evaluation of the teacher, the teaching process, teaching approaches and the learning outcomes. Due to its reported dubious reliability and validity, and inherent bias in measuring the quality of teaching, SET remains a hotly debated and controversial instrument. This study evaluated thereliability and validity of the SET scale adopted by the National University of Lesotho. Self-administered SET questionnaires were distributed to 104 third- and fourth-year Bachelor of Commerce students to evaluate ten lecturers, resulting in 751 assessment records. The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). While the findings suggest that the SET instrument used at the university is reasonably reliable and valid, minor concerns were raised with regard to discriminant validity, and serious concerns in relation to content validity. Based on the existing literature and the psychometric properties of this SET instrument, it is recommended that university management exercise caution in using its results to make evaluative personnel decisions such as promotions, confirmations, and dismissals. It is also recommended that the SET instrument should be revised and validated and be primarily used for formative purposes such as obtaining feedback for the development of individual instructors.
Key words: formative assessment, reliability, student evaluation of teaching, summative assessment, validity