z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Human Perivascular Stem Cell‐Based Bone Graft Substitute Induces Rat Spinal Fusion
Author(s) -
Chung Choon G.,
James Aaron W.,
Asatrian Greg,
Chang Le,
Nguyen Alan,
Le Khoi,
Bayani Georgina,
Lee Robert,
Stoker David,
Pang Shen,
Zhang Xinli,
Ting Kang,
Péault Bruno,
Soo Chia
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
stem cells translational medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.781
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 2157-6580
pISSN - 2157-6564
DOI - 10.5966/sctm.2014-0027
Subject(s) - stem cell , spinal fusion , cell fusion , mesenchymal stem cell , pathology , cell , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , biology , surgery , biochemistry
Adipose tissue is an attractive source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) because of its abundance and accessibility. We have previously defined a population of native MSCs termed perivascular stem cells (PSCs), purified from diverse human tissues, including adipose tissue. Human PSCs (hPSCs) are a bipartite cell population composed of pericytes (CD146+CD34−CD45−) and adventitial cells (CD146−CD34+CD45−), isolated by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting and with properties identical to those of culture identified MSCs. Our previous studies showed that hPSCs exhibit improved bone formation compared with a sample‐matched unpurified population (termed stromal vascular fraction); however, it is not known whether hPSCs would be efficacious in a spinal fusion model. To investigate, we evaluated the osteogenic potential of freshly sorted hPSCs without culture expansion and differentiation in a rat model of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. We compared increasing dosages of implanted hPSCs to assess for dose‐dependent efficacy. All hPSC treatment groups induced successful spinal fusion, assessed by manual palpation and microcomputed tomography. Computerized biomechanical simulation (finite element analysis) further demonstrated bone fusion with hPSC treatment. Histological analyses showed robust endochondral ossification in hPSC‐treated samples. Finally, we confirmed that implanted hPSCs indeed differentiated into osteoblasts and osteocytes; however, the majority of the new bone formation was of host origin. These results suggest that implanted hPSCs positively regulate bone formation via direct and paracrine mechanisms. In summary, hPSCs are a readily available MSC population that effectively forms bone without requirements for culture or predifferentiation. Thus, hPSC‐based products show promise for future efforts in clinical bone regeneration and repair.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here