Open Access
Cost‐Effective Master Cell Bank Validation of Multiple Clinical‐Grade Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines From a Single Donor
Author(s) -
Devito Liani,
Petrova Anastasia,
Miere Cristian,
Codognotto Stefano,
Blakely Nicola,
Lovatt Archie,
Ogilvie Caroline,
Khalaf Yacoub,
Ilic Dusko
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
stem cells translational medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.781
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 2157-6580
pISSN - 2157-6564
DOI - 10.5966/sctm.2014-0015
Subject(s) - induced pluripotent stem cell , embryonic stem cell , stem cell , microbiology and biotechnology , cell culture , cell therapy , human induced pluripotent stem cells , biology , computer science , computational biology , genetics , gene
Standardization guidelines for human pluripotent stem cells are still very broadly defined, despite ongoing clinical trials in the U.S., U.K., and Japan. The requirements for validation of human embryonic (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in general follow the regulations for other clinically compliant biologics already in place but without addressing key differences between cell types or final products. In order to realize the full potential of stem cell therapy, validation criteria, methodology, and, most importantly, strategy, should address the shortfalls and efficiency of current approaches; without this, hESC‐ and, especially, iPSC‐based therapy will not be able to compete with other technologies in a cost‐efficient way. We addressed the protocols for testing cell lines for human viral pathogens and propose a novel strategy that would significantly reduce costs. It is highly unlikely that the multiple cell lines derived in parallel from a tissue sample taken from one donor would have different profiles of endogenous viral pathogens; we therefore argue that samples from the Master Cell Banks of sibling lines could be safely pooled for validation. We illustrate this approach with tiered validation of two sibling clinical‐grade hESC lines, KCL033 and KCL034 (stage 1, sterility; stage 2, specific human pathogens; and stage 3, nonspecific human pathogens). The results of all tests were negative. This cost‐effective strategy could also be applied for validation of Master Cell Banks of multiple clinical‐grade iPSC lines derived from a single donor.