z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Safety of Epicenter Versus Intact Parenchyma as a Transplantation Site for Human Neural Stem Cells for Spinal Cord Injury Therapy
Author(s) -
Piltti Katja M.,
Salazar Desirée L.,
Uchida Nobuko,
Cummings Brian J.,
Anderson Aileen J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
stem cells translational medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.781
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 2157-6580
pISSN - 2157-6564
DOI - 10.5966/sctm.2012-0110
Subject(s) - transplantation , spinal cord injury , neural stem cell , medicine , spinal cord , central nervous system , stem cell , parenchyma , pathology , biology , surgery , microbiology and biotechnology , psychiatry
This study compared transplantation into the spinal cord injury (SCI) epicenter (EPI) versus intact rostral/caudal (R/C) parenchyma in contusion‐injured athymic nude rats and assessed the survival, differentiation, and migration of human central nervous system‐derived neural stem cells (hCNS‐SCns). Regardless of transplantation site, hCNS‐SCns survived and proliferated; however, the total number of hCNS‐SCns quantified in the R/C transplant animals was twice that in the EPI animals, demonstrating increased overall engraftment. Findings suggest that the intact parenchyma may be a more favorable transplantation site than the injury epicenter in the subacute period post‐SCI.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here