
The Technopolitics of Mapping Dar es Salaam: An examination of the technological and political motivations of the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team
Author(s) -
Doug Specht
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
espacio, tiempo y forma. serie vi, geografía/espacio, tiempo y forma. serie vi, geografía
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2340-146X
pISSN - 1130-2968
DOI - 10.5944/etfvi.14.2021.30644
Subject(s) - citizen journalism , tanzania , politics , context (archaeology) , delegation , work (physics) , position (finance) , political science , road map , public relations , business , geography , environmental planning , cartography , engineering , mechanical engineering , archaeology , law , finance
Mapping has long formed a key part of development work, from recording household surveys, participatory mapping exercises, and PRA projects. Now though the sector is full of new actors- mapping and tech companies as well as NGOs- monitoring through drones and satellite images, alongside employing more traditional methods. Many of these new players were born from NGOs and companies who started as ‘crisis mappers. Short-term ‘crisis mapping’ projects have become a regular part of humanitarian response following a disaster. The short-term nature of such actions, and the need for stable employment/profits, has led to an increasing trend for the same organizations and companies to either remain on the ground producing maps or to move into new areas as part of a pre-emptive mapping practice, inserting themselves into the wider international development ecosystem. This research, centered on Tanzania, examines how HOTOSM has attempted to pivot towards working as a development organization that creates maps for prevention of crisis, but also wider socio-economic outputs. The research used interviews to explore the interplay between technology and micro/macro politics around the mapping of Dar es Salaam. Examining how HOTOSM its role, and how they position their map-making within the context of Dar es Salaam. Findings suggest that HOTOSM is still underdeveloped as an organization and lacks the maturity to create true participatory models of working.