Premium
Behavioral economics and the design of a dual‐flush toilet
Author(s) -
Arocha Jade S.,
McCann Laura M.J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal ‐ american water works association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.466
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1551-8833
pISSN - 0003-150X
DOI - 10.5942/jawwa.2013.105.0017
Subject(s) - toilet , environmental science , environmental engineering
Dual‐flush toilets, which use a high‐volume flush for solid waste and a lower‐volume flush for liquid waste, can reduce water consumption. Behavioral economics was used to analyze the design of the dual‐flush mechanism for the Sloan Uppercut® toilet. The default option, pushing the handle down, results in a large flush. Because Americans have been “conditioned” to push a toilet handle down, it was expected that most users would push it down out of habit. A field experiment measuring up versus down flushes in eight women's toilets in a municipal building confirmed this expectation. Although Sloan predicted a 2:1 urination‐to‐defecation ratio, the observed ratio during the control period was 1:4, i.e. the ratio was the opposite of what would occur if people used the toilets correctly. Adding signage to each stall only increased the ratio to 2:5, emphasizing the importance of the default.