z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The legal insignificance of the financial coverage at the bill of exchange and the cheque
Author(s) -
Svetislav Janković
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
anali pravnog fakulteta u beogradu
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2406-2693
pISSN - 0003-2565
DOI - 10.5937/analipfb2003172j
Subject(s) - obligation , cheque , position (finance) , order (exchange) , business , cover (algebra) , finance , law , law and economics , economics , political science , computer security , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering
Due to the identical personal structure, the bill of exchange and the cheque have a common feature regarding the drawer's cover on a banking account which is administrated by the drawee. It seems that sufficiency of adequate funds, which should cover the drawer's order from these instruments, doesn't have any legal significance for the drawee and the acceptor. At first glance the position of drawee and acceptor is different because the drawee's obligation is also not derived from the bill of exchange; however, the acceptor has an obligation due to his acceptance of the drawer's order. However, at the stage of collection, drawee and acceptor have a similar position regarding financial cover by drawer's account. Regardless of whether there is financial coverage, the legal position of the drawee and acceptor remains unchanged, because their position could be changed only through their legally relevant will, manifested in the instrument as such.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here