z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Active surveillance in leprosy: how useful is it?
Author(s) -
Rosemary A. Croft
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
leprosy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 2162-8807
pISSN - 0305-7518
DOI - 10.5935/0305-7518.19960014
Subject(s) - medicine , leprosy , danish , prednisolone , surgery , dermatology , philosophy , linguistics
In this paper, active surveillance is compared with self-reporting as a method of detecting new nerve function loss in leprosy patients who have completed multidrug therapy (MDT). Five hundred and three patients were selected according to new surveillance guidelines in one part of the Danish-Bangladesh Leprosy Mission leprosy control project working area. Surveillance coverage of 71% was achieved in a 7-month period. During this time, 10 released-from-treatment (RFT) patients from among the study group were found to have acute nerve damage requiring prednisolone treatment. Out of the 10, only 2 were detected actively; the remaining 8 self-reported. It is concluded that health education given at RFT time is effective in motivating patients to self-report with acute nerve damage, and that the time spent on active surveillance could have been better used in other activities, i.e., case detection. As a result of these findings, active surveillance has been abandoned in the leprosy control project.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here