z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Кант versus Владимир Соловьёв: гносеология с рефлексией и без таковой
Author(s) -
Валентин Валентинович Балановский
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
kantovskij sbornik
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2310-3701
pISSN - 0207-6918
DOI - 10.5922/0207-6918-2011-2-5
Subject(s) - medicine
This article seeks to compare Immanuel Kant's and Vladimir Solovyov's gnosiologies. The comparison is based on the philosophers' attitude to reflection — a basic cognitive mechanism. If, according to Kant, the acquisition of true knowledge is impossible without reflection (including transcendental reflection), Solovyov builds his theory of knowledge on entirely different grounds, therefore, he has to relyon God and intellectual intuition in discovering the truth. Only having established the pros and cons of both gnoseologies, we can define whose theory — Kant’s or Solovyov’s — is more suitable to describe the process of cognition by a human being — a being in possession of rather modest cognitive tools

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here