Open AccessPulmonary rehabilitation for COVID-19: A living systematic review protocol
Author(s) -
Stefanie Arce Pardo,
Shuheng Lai,
Luis E. Ortiz-Muñoz,
Rocío Bravo-Jeria,
Francisca Verdugo-Paiva,
Gabriel Rada
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
medwave
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.178
H-Index - 7
ISSN - 0717-6384
DOI - 10.5867/medwave.2021.06.8223
Subject(s) - systematic review , protocol (science) , covid-19 , medicine , pulmonary rehabilitation , grading (engineering) , rehabilitation , psychological intervention , medline , alternative medicine , physical therapy , nursing , pathology , political science , engineering , civil engineering , disease , law , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Objective This living systematic review aims to provide a timely, rigorous and continuously updated summary of the evidence available on the role of pulmonary rehabilitation in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Design This is the protocol of a living systematic review. Data sources We will conduct searches in the L·OVE (Living OVerview of Evidence) platform for COVID-19, a system that maps PICO questions to a repository maintained through regular searches in electronic databases, preprint servers, trial registries and other resources relevant to COVID-19. No date or language restrictions will be applied. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies and methods We adapted an already published common protocol for multiple parallel systematic reviews to the specificities of this question. We will include randomized trials evaluating the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation as monotherapy or in combination with other interventions-versus sham or no treatment in patients with COVID-19. Two reviewers will independently screen each study for eligibility, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. We will pool the results using meta-analysis and will apply the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome. Ethics and dissemination No ethics approval is considered necessary. The results of this review will be widely disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, social networks and traditional media.