Open AccessEditor’s Note
Author(s) -
Jennifer K. Sheehan
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
rbm
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2150-668X
pISSN - 1529-6407
DOI - 10.5860/rbm.16.2.444
Subject(s) - section (typography) , advice (programming) , reflection (computer programming) , field (mathematics) , psychology , history , sociology , computer science , mathematics , pure mathematics , programming language , operating system
Over the past year, I've tried to take the pulse of our profession, getting a sense of what people are doing, what the most pressing concerns might be, and how RBM can be a reflection of all of the above. As I've been asking colleagues for advice on new directions to explore for RBM, more than once someone has suggested, “What about opinion pieces or reflections from people who have been in the field a while?” Those of you who have read RBM for many years will likely recognize this as a resurrection of the “Notes” section that can be . . .