z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Original Facticity and the Incompleteness of Knowledge
Author(s) -
Modesto Manuel Gómez Alonso
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
logos and episteme
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.334
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 2069-3052
pISSN - 2069-0533
DOI - 10.5840/logos-episteme202011437
Subject(s) - facticity , situated , conviction , skepticism , epistemology , consciousness , contingency , empiricism , openness to experience , sociology , psychology , philosophy , social psychology , computer science , political science , artificial intelligence , law
This article critically explores Nuno Venturinha’s project of capturing how we are situated in reality, a project grounded in the conviction that the closure of knowledge and the openness of experience are compatible. To this end, I will explore how an approach complementary to Venturinha’s method—one which regards the passive and the active in knowledge as rooted in a single, underlying original form of consciousness—would deal with the issue of justifying contingency without falling into either scepticism or empiricism.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here