Open AccessUrban American Indian and Alaska Native Data Sovereignty: Ethical Issues
Author(s) -
Emily A. Haozous,
Juliet Lee,
Claradina Soto
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
american indian and alaska native mental health research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.44
H-Index - 24
ISSN - 0893-5394
DOI - 10.5820/aian.2802.2021.77
Subject(s) - sovereignty , indigenous , general partnership , government (linguistics) , politics , political science , public administration , economic growth , self determination , law , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , economics , biology
This paper examines the ethical issues underlying research with urban American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) through the lens of tribal sovereignty. There are 574 federally recognized tribes within the United States. Each of those tribes is recognized by the federal government as having sovereign status, an important political designation that ensures that decisions impacting tribal peoples must be made after consultation with those nations. Most AI/AN people live away from their designated tribal lands, yet their sovereign rights are frequently only recognized when living on tribal lands. These urban AI/ANs are still considered citizens of their sovereign nations, yet they lack the protections afforded to those who live on tribal lands, including protections surrounding research with their tribal communities. We explore the Belmont Report and related documents and demonstrate their inadequacy in considering the cultural and ethical concerns specific to protecting urban AI/ANs. We also provide several solutions to help guide future institutional policies regarding research with urban AI/ANs that honors Indigenous data sovereignty, including consultation, partnership with community advisory boards, employment of data use agreements, and ensuring informed consent.